# A-135 anti-ballistic missile system

The A-135 is a Russian anti-ballistic missile system deployed around Moscow, designed to defend the capital and its surrounding industrial region against a limited ballistic missile attack using nuclear-armed interceptors and the Don-2N battle-management radar. It is the successor to the first-generation A-35 system and remains the only strategic missile defense system Russia operates, covering Moscow rather than the country as a whole.<sup>[1](https://www.globalsecurity.org.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/a-135.htm)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup>

| Key fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Defense of Moscow against a limited strike; Soviet estimates put its capability at intercepting about 1-2 modern ICBMs<sup>[3](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)</sup> |
| Authorization | USSR Council of Ministers Resolution No. 376-119 of 10 June 1971 authorized the system's creation<sup>[4](https://www.generalstaff.org/WW3/GEO/CW_Geodesy_A135_ABM.htm)</sup> |
| Treaty limits | The 1972 ABM Treaty allowed 100 interceptors at one site; A-135 filled the quota with 32 exoatmospheric Gorgon and 68 endoatmospheric Gazelle interceptors<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup> |
| Current force | 68 silo-based 53T6 (Gazelle) short-range interceptors at five sites near Moscow, plus the Don-2N radar at Pushkino; the 32 long-range interceptors were withdrawn around 2006<sup>[6](https://www.lasg.org/Modernization/assuring-destruction-forever-2022.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup> |
| Warheads | Gazelle interceptors use low-yield nuclear warheads designed to detonate between 5 and 30 kilometers above the defended area<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup> |
| Service dates | Accepted for pilot joint operations in 1990; began combat duty in 1995<sup>[3](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)</sup> |
| Operator | The Russian Aerospace Defence Forces' 9th Ballistic Missile Defence Division<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup> |

## Origins and development

Work on the A-135 program began in late 1968, when a group of specialists under A.G. Basistov was assigned to develop the concept for a new missile defense system for the Soviet capital. The concept called for a defense of Moscow against single, accidental, or provocative ballistic missile strikes, or a limited group of missiles launched from third countries or from a single rogue submarine.<sup>[7](https://pvo.guns.ru/abm/a135.htm)</sup> By the end of 1969 a two-tier interception concept, similar in structure to the US Spartan/Sprint pairing, had been agreed with the Soviet Ministry of Defense.<sup>[1](https://www.globalsecurity.org.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/a-135.htm)</sup>

On 10 June 1971, USSR Council of Ministers Resolution No. 376-119 authorized creation of the A-135 system, built around the "Amur" long-range interception firing complex and an "Amur-P" prototype. Early plans called for three Amur complexes 600 to 800 km from Moscow, backed by three S-225 air defense complexes. After the ABM Treaty was signed in June 1972, the system was redesigned so that all of its assets fit within a 100 km area around Moscow, and the S-225 complexes were removed; the S-225's short-range interceptor, the PRS-1 (5Ya26), was retained as the atmospheric tier under the new index 53T6.<sup>[4](https://www.generalstaff.org/WW3/GEO/CW_Geodesy_A135_ABM.htm)</sup> OKB Fakel was selected as the main contractor for the long-range two-stage exoatmospheric interceptor, the A-925/51T6.<sup>[4](https://www.generalstaff.org/WW3/GEO/CW_Geodesy_A135_ABM.htm)</sup>

The ABM Treaty shaped the deployment directly. The treaty limited each side to no more than 100 interceptors at one permitted site, and the A-135 filled that quota with thirty-two exoatmospheric Gorgon interceptors and sixty-eight endoatmospheric Gazelle interceptors.<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup> A prototype firing complex was built at the Sary-Shagan test range, where tests of the system, known there as Amur, ran from March to October 1987.<sup>[3](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)</sup>

## Structure

The deployed system centers on the Don-2N battle-management radar at Pushkino, near Moscow, which provides targeting data for the interceptors.<sup>[6](https://www.lasg.org/Modernization/assuring-destruction-forever-2022.pdf)</sup> When the system entered service in 1995 it also included the Dunay-3U (Cat House) radar at Chekhov, 16 long-range 51T6/Gorgon interceptors, and 68 short-range 53T6/Gazelle interceptors.<sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup> The Gorgon interceptors were retired in 2006 without replacement, leaving the operational system with only the shorter-range endoatmospheric Gazelles.<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup>

Because the accuracy of the interceptors was insufficient to guarantee destruction of a complex incoming ballistic target, both the A-35/A-35M and the A-135 used nuclear-tipped rather than conventional interceptors. The Gazelle's low-yield nuclear warheads are designed to detonate between altitudes of 5 and 30 kilometers above the defended area.<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup> It has been reported that the interceptor missiles are normally deployed without their nuclear warheads installed, which would be stored at a facility about 80 km southwest of Moscow and mounted on the interceptors only during a "threatening period."<sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup>

## Performance and limitations

Soviet estimates made while the system was being built put its capability at intercepting one or two "modern ICBMs." A 1985 Soviet government memo stated that the completed A-135 was to provide protection from a strike of 1-2 modern and prospective ICBMs and up to 35 Pershing 2-type intermediate-range missiles.<sup>[3](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)</sup> US assessments during the Cold War were similarly unimpressed: a 1989 report concluded that with only 100 interceptors the system could be saturated, and with a single battle-management radar at Pushkino supporting the missiles it was highly vulnerable to suppression.<sup>[8](https://www.ucs.org/resources/history-russias-anti-ballistic-missile-abm-system)</sup>

The system's radars, however, are actively used as part of Russia's space situational awareness and early-warning network, a role that continues regardless of the interceptors' limited capability.<sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup>

## Service history

The Ministry of Defense did not accept the system after the 1987 Sary-Shagan tests and returned it to industry for further work. A second test series followed in 1989, and A-135 was accepted for "pilot joint operations" in 1990, with industry representatives operating the system alongside the military. It did not begin combat duty until 1995.<sup>[3](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)</sup> At the time of the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991 the system had not yet reached full operational capability, and post-Soviet budget cuts ended most work on associated upgrades.<sup>[8](https://www.ucs.org/resources/history-russias-anti-ballistic-missile-abm-system)</sup>

Testing continued at a low rate after deployment. November 1999 saw Russia conduct the system's first test firing since 1993, launching a Gazelle interceptor without a warhead from the Moscow complex.<sup>[9](https://pub.sergev.org/pub/pub/pub/doc/Russian-nuclear-weapons-2025.pdf)</sup>

## Modernization

Despite its limited capability, Russia has invested in upgrading the system. Around 2007 it completed modernization of the Don-2N radar, and in 2011 it began tests of a modified short-range interceptor, the 53T6M. An upgrade of the Dunay-3U radar at Chekhov followed. These efforts are linked to two larger projects: the Samolyot-M upgrade of the A-135, and the Nudol anti-satellite system. Samolyot-M traces back to the Soviet A-235 project outlined in the 1980s and appears to be a moderate upgrade of key A-135 elements, possibly including a new interceptor capable of exoatmospheric intercept; Soviet projections assumed the follow-on system would intercept 8-12 warheads accompanied by decoys and other penetration aids.<sup>[2](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)</sup> In 2017 Russia began tests of a new modernized interceptor for the A-135 system.<sup>[6](https://www.lasg.org/Modernization/assuring-destruction-forever-2022.pdf)</sup> The move toward a successor reflects a safety concern as well: defending the Russian capital with nuclear-armed interceptors so close to Moscow is not the safest solution, and the Samolet-M design study, ordered by State Contract 406/1591 of 31 January 1991, aims at interceptor accuracy high enough to remove the need for nuclear intercept.<sup>[5](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)</sup>

## References

1. [A-135 ABM, GlobalSecurity.org](https://www.globalsecurity.org.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/a-135.htm)
2. [Missile Defense in Russia, Federation of American Scientists](https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/Missile-Defense-In-Russia.pdf)
3. [Very modest expectations: Performance of Moscow missile defense, Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces (Pavel Podvig), 2012](https://russianforces.org/blog/2012/10/very_modest_expectations_sovie.shtml)
4. [Cold War Geodesy: Soviet A-135 ABM System Locations, General Staff](https://www.generalstaff.org/WW3/GEO/CW_Geodesy_A135_ABM.htm)
5. [Ballistic-Missile and Air-Defence Systems, RUSI (2012)](https://static.rusi.org/201211_op_atomic_accounting.pdf)
6. [Assuring Destruction Forever, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists / LASG (2022)](https://www.lasg.org/Modernization/assuring-destruction-forever-2022.pdf)
7. [Система противоракетной обороны А-135, pvo.guns.ru](https://pvo.guns.ru/abm/a135.htm)
8. [History of Russia's Anti-ballistic Missile (ABM) System, Union of Concerned Scientists (2002)](https://www.ucs.org/resources/history-russias-anti-ballistic-missile-abm-system)
9. [Russian nuclear weapons, 2025, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists](https://pub.sergev.org/pub/pub/pub/doc/Russian-nuclear-weapons-2025.pdf)

---
*Topic: Encyclopedia › Society and history › Conflict and security › Air defense and anti-aircraft warfare › Anti-aircraft weapons and systems › Surface-to-air missile systems*

*Initially written Sep 17, 2026 · Reviewed: Sep 30, 2026; Oct 15, 2026 · Edited: Sep 30, 2026; Oct 15, 2026 · Last review: Oct 15, 2026*

*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*

License: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license
