{
 "id": "epdp4yfkbf",
 "slug": "central-pancreatectomy",
 "title": "Central pancreatectomy",
 "updated": "2026-10-15",
 "topic_path": [
  {
   "id": "life",
   "label": "Life and health",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health",
   "label": "Human health and medicine",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical",
   "label": "Clinical assessment and procedures",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery",
   "label": "Surgery and surgical specialties",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures",
   "label": "Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery procedures",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures"
  }
 ],
 "geo": [
  {
   "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures",
   "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000: Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery procedures",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures",
   "path": [
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo",
     "label": "Non-geographic",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946",
     "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life",
     "label": "Life and health",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health",
     "label": "Human health and medicine",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical",
     "label": "Clinical assessment and procedures",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery",
     "label": "Surgery and surgical specialties",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures",
     "label": "Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery procedures",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures"
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "excerpt": "Central pancreatectomy, also known as middle pancreatectomy, is a pancreas-sparing operation removing the middle segment for benign or low-grade lesions, trading lower diabetes risk for a high fistula rate.",
 "snippet": "Central pancreatectomy, also known as middle pancreatectomy, is a pancreas-sparing operation removing the middle segment for benign or low-grade lesions, trading lower diabetes risk for a high fistula rate.",
 "node": "life.health.clinical.clinical-surgery.hepatobiliary-and-pancreatic-surgery-procedures",
 "markdown": "# Central pancreatectomy\n\nCentral pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing operation that removes the middle segment of the pancreas, usually the neck and proximal body, while preserving the head and tail, and is intended for benign or low-grade lesions in that location. Usually only the distal remnant is reconnected to the digestive tract, most often by pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy, while the proximal stump is closed.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> The operation is also reported under the names middle pancreatectomy and middle segmental pancreatectomy.<sup>[2](https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/01122010-JHPS.pdf)</sup> Its appeal is metabolic: keeping the head and tail maintains most of the pancreas's endocrine and exocrine tissue and avoids the long-term metabolic consequences of removing the distal gland.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> Its price is a second cut surface on the pancreas, which drives a high pancreatic fistula rate.<sup>[3](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599816/)</sup>\n\n| Key fact | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Target pathology | Benign or low-grade lesions of the pancreatic neck and proximal body, such as cystic neoplasms, low-grade neuroendocrine tumors, and solid pseudopapillary tumors; contraindicated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> |\n| Main trade-off | Lower new-onset diabetes than distal pancreatectomy (OR 0.23) but roughly double the pancreatic fistula rate (36.9% vs 20.2%)<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> |\n| Clinically relevant fistula (ISGPS grade B/C) | 26.3% after CP versus 12.9% after distal pancreatectomy<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> |\n| Endocrine benefit | New-onset diabetes in about 11–12% after CP versus 20–50% after distal pancreatectomy<sup>[5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK564309/)</sup> |\n| Exocrine benefit | About 10% of CP patients need enzyme supplementation versus 27% after distal pancreatectomy<sup>[5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK564309/)</sup> |\n| Minimally invasive approach | Less blood loss (mean difference −153.13 mL) than open CP, with no difference in operative time, major complications, mortality, or hospital stay<sup>[3](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599816/)</sup> |\n| Current position | Recommended only for selected cases; a 2025 meta-analysis concluded CP \"cannot yet be routinely recommended\"<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> |\n\n## How it works\n\nThe rationale is anatomical and physiological. Resecting only the central segment leaves the pancreatic head, with its shared bile duct and duodenal continuity, and the body-tail in place, so a majority of endocrine and exocrine parenchyma is preserved and pancreaticoduodenectomy is avoided.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[6](https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.143)</sup> The spleen can also be preserved. The cost is that the operation creates two divided pancreatic edges, each a potential source of pancreatic fistula, which explains fistula rates higher than those of standard resections.<sup>[2](https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/01122010-JHPS.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[3](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599816/)</sup> A key safety step is protecting the dorsal pancreatic arteries, which supply blood to the pancreatic neck.<sup>[7](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-025-17028-y)</sup>\n\n## How it is done\n\nAfter mobilization of the pancreatic neck and proximal body, the gland is transected proximally and distally around the lesion. The proximal (head-side) stump is typically closed and buried with interrupted stitches after elective closure of the pancreatic duct.<sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup> The distal stump is drained by an anastomosis: pancreaticojejunostomy, most often a Roux-en-Y duct-to-mucosa or invagination construction, is the most frequent reconstruction, followed by pancreaticogastrostomy.<sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> The choice between pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy remains unsettled: comparative data are limited and outcomes appear virtually indistinguishable, with the decision usually driven by surgeon preference.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> In robotic series, both reconstructions are considered feasible (87.0% expert agreement in the 2023 consensus).<sup>[9](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839730/)</sup>\n\n## Origin\n\nPublished accounts disagree on surgical priority. Some reviews credit a central segmental resection for chronic pancreatitis with both remnants anastomosed to an omega-shaped jejunal loop, and drainage of the tail into a Roux-en-Y loop after traumatic body injury; others note these operations addressed only the reconstructive aspect.<sup>[2](https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/01122010-JHPS.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup> The operation for a pancreatic neoplasm is reported in Enciclopedia Medica Italiana, although another review dates the first neoplasm case to 1984.<sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[2](https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/01122010-JHPS.pdf)</sup> The first robotic CP was reported by Giulianotti and colleagues in 2004.<sup>[10](https://apc.amegroups.org/article/view/3987/html)</sup>\n\n## Variants\n\nCP is performed open, laparoscopically, or robotically. Since 2010, most minimally invasive case series have used a robotic system, and in minimally invasive series pancreaticogastrostomy was used in 31 patients (51.7%) versus pancreaticojejunostomy in 17 (28.3%). A meta-analysis of seven comparative studies (289 patients) found minimally invasive CP reduced intraoperative blood loss by a mean of 153.13 mL without reducing transfusion need, and showed less grade B–C fistula (OR 0.54) that did not remain consistent in sensitivity analyses; operative time, Clavien–Dindo ≥3 complications, mortality, and length of stay did not differ.<sup>[3](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599816/)</sup> The 2023 international consensus grades robotic CP as safe and efficient as open CP (Grade 2C, weak recommendation, 87.0% expert agreement), noting less blood loss but a high overall postoperative pancreatic fistula rate.<sup>[9](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839730/)</sup> Recent technical developments include an end-to-end pancreatic anastomosis after robotic CP, which shortened operative time and reduced blood loss but raised the fistula rate.<sup>[9](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839730/)</sup>\n\n## Applications\n\nCP suits benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the neck or proximal body when enucleation is not feasible: low-grade neuroendocrine tumors, non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), serous and mucinous cystadenomas, solid pseudopapillary tumors, focal chronic pancreatitis with a short Wirsung stenosis, and solitary metastases.<sup>[11](https://www.scielo.br/j/abcd/a/ySQ8CGKJvrRjXScxRK6jHgh/?lang=en)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[12](https://jovs.amegroups.org/article/view/15747/html)</sup> Lesions are typically 2–5 cm, deeply located near the neck.<sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup> Contraindications include pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and other malignant tumors, diffuse chronic pancreatitis, distal body-tail atrophy, and lesions large enough that at least 5 cm of viable distal stump cannot be preserved; a distal stump under 5 cm is a standard contraindication, though some centers operate down to 4 cm.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[13](https://www.ahbps.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.14701%2Fahbps.22-042)</sup> For non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors, current recommendations increasingly favor a selective parenchyma-sparing approach even for lesions up to 3 cm if well differentiated without nodal or distant metastases.<sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> A 2025 meta-analysis of 26 studies (774 CP, 1713 distal pancreatectomies) found overall pancreatic fistula of 36.9% after CP versus 20.2% after DP (OR 2.25), and ISGPS grade B/C fistula of 26.3% versus 12.9% (OR 2.73).<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> Mortality is low: four deaths across 22 studies in the 2025 meta-analysis (0.45% CP, 0.06% DP, difference not significant), and 0.8% overall in a 2013 review of 963 patients.<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[14](https://iris.univr.it/handle/11562/653974)</sup> The metabolic benefit is consistent: CP lowers new-onset diabetes (OR 0.23) and overall endocrine and exocrine insufficiency versus DP,<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> with new-onset diabetes in 11–12% versus 20–50% and enzyme supplementation in 10% versus 27% in a clinical reference summary.<sup>[5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK564309/)</sup>\n\n## Limitations and alternatives\n\nThe dominant failure mode is pancreatic fistula from either cut surface, with soft glands and small ducts as risk factors; most fistulas are clinically insignificant, but the grade B/C burden is real and postoperative hemorrhage is more frequent than after DP.<sup>[10](https://apc.amegroups.org/article/view/3987/html)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[15](https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/7057026)</sup> CP also risks a positive distal pancreatic margin and inadequate lymph node removal, which is why it is contraindicated in ductal adenocarcinoma.<sup>[7](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-025-17028-y)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[1](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)</sup> The main alternative is distal pancreatectomy, including spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy; in a 22-versus-25-patient comparison, CP resected a median of 5 cm of gland versus 8.5 cm for SPDP, with similar fistula rates (36% vs 40%) and no new diabetes in successful CP versus 16% after SPDP.<sup>[16](https://karger.com/dsu/article/29/5/400/117433/Central-Pancreatectomy-versus-Spleen-Preserving)</sup> Enucleation is an alternative for selected small lesions, but CP is generally used when enucleation would risk main pancreatic duct injury.<sup>[8](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)</sup> The 2025 meta-analysis recommends CP as an alternative to DP only in selected cases, with no pancreatic disease beyond the target lesion, a residual distal pancreas of at least 5 cm, branch-duct IPMN, and low assessed fistula risk.<sup>[4](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)</sup> The 2023 robotic consensus recommends robotic CP for benign and borderline neck and proximal body tumors (Grade 1B, 96.0% expert agreement).<sup>[9](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839730/)</sup>\n\n## References\n\n1. [Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Surgery: Current Indications, Results, and Future Prospects](https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/10/1550)\n2. [Middle pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasms](https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/01122010-JHPS.pdf)\n3. [Minimally invasive versus open central pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599816/)\n4. [Effectiveness and safety of central pancreatectomy in benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic body lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/27d29c8bcf69f32f1b69370b1ff70755/js9-109-2025.PMC10389642.pdf)\n5. [Distal Pancreatectomy - StatPearls](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK564309/)\n6. [Minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: current status and future directions](https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.143)\n7. [Robotic Central Pancreatectomy: Patient Selection and Surgical Approach | Annals of Surgical Oncology](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-025-17028-y)\n8. [Central pancreatectomy: The Dagradi Serio Iacono operation. Evolution of a surgical technique from the pioneers to the robotic approach](https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i42/15674.htm)\n9. [International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10839730/)\n10. [Robotic central pancreatectomy and pancreatogastrostomy: surgical technique and review of literature - Javed - Annals of Pancreatic Cancer](https://apc.amegroups.org/article/view/3987/html)\n11. [Central pancreatectomy: a Latin American experience of parenchyma-sparing surgery for benign and low-grade pancreatic neoplasms](https://www.scielo.br/j/abcd/a/ySQ8CGKJvrRjXScxRK6jHgh/?lang=en)\n12. [Robotic central pancreatectomy - Hamad - Journal of Visualized Surgery](https://jovs.amegroups.org/article/view/15747/html)\n13. [Is central pancreatectomy an effective alternative to distal pancreatectomy for low-grade pancreatic neck and body tumors: A 20-year single-center propensity score-matched case-control study](https://www.ahbps.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.14701%2Fahbps.22-042)\n14. [Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy (BJS, 2013)](https://iris.univr.it/handle/11562/653974)\n15. [Overall Postoperative Morbidity and Pancreatic Fistula Are Relatively Higher after Central Pancreatectomy than Distal Pancreatic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis](https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/7057026)\n16. [Central Pancreatectomy versus Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Early and Late Postoperative Outcomes](https://karger.com/dsu/article/29/5/400/117433/Central-Pancreatectomy-versus-Spleen-Preserving)\n\n---\n*Topic: Encyclopedia › Life and health › Human health and medicine › Clinical assessment and procedures › Surgery and surgical specialties › Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery procedures*\n\n*Initially written Sep 29, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026*\n\n*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*\n\nLicense: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\n",
 "same_as": [],
 "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy",
 "markdown_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy.md",
 "license": {
  "name": "Edgepedia Community License 1.0",
  "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license",
  "summary": "Free with credit, commercial use included. AI training is open to everyone. For other uses, organizations over USD 100M in revenue or 100M monthly users license separately.",
  "spdx": "LicenseRef-Edgepedia-Community-1.0"
 },
 "credit": "\"Central pancreatectomy\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.",
 "credit_md": "\"[Central pancreatectomy](https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy)\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), [https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy](https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy). [Edgepedia Community License 1.0](https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license).",
 "credit_html": "\"<a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy\">Central pancreatectomy</a>\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy\">https://www.edgepedia.org/central-pancreatectomy</a>. <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\">Edgepedia Community License 1.0</a>.",
 "speakable": "Central pancreatectomy, also known as middle pancreatectomy, is a pancreas-sparing operation removing the middle segment for benign or low-grade lesions, trading lower diabetes risk for a high fistula rate."
}
