{ "id": "ephm8k303j", "slug": "chromatography-mass-spectrometry", "title": "Chromatography–mass spectrometry", "updated": "2026-09-30", "topic_path": [ { "id": "physical", "label": "Physical world and mathematics", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry", "label": "Chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods", "label": "Chemical principles and methods", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry", "label": "Analytical chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography", "label": "Chromatography", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods.specialized-chromatography-techniques", "label": "Specialized chromatography techniques", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods.specialized-chromatography-techniques" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods.specialized-chromatography-techniques.specialized-chromatography-overview", "label": "Specialized and hyphenated chromatography (overview)", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods.specialized-chromatography-techniques.specialized-chromatography-overview" } ], "geo": [ { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry", "label": "Non-geographic · 1800 to 1945: Analytical chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry", "path": [ { "id": "geo.nongeo", "label": "Non-geographic", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800", "label": "Non-geographic · 1800 to 1945", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800.physical", "label": "Physical world and mathematics", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800.physical" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry", "label": "Chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods", "label": "Chemical principles and methods", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry", "label": "Analytical chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1800.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry" } ] }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography", "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000: Chromatography", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography", "path": [ { "id": "geo.nongeo", "label": "Non-geographic", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946", "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical", "label": "Physical world and mathematics", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry", "label": "Chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods", "label": "Chemical principles and methods", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry", "label": "Analytical chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.analytical-chemistry" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography", "label": "Chromatography", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chromatography" } ] } ], "excerpt": "Chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS) couples chromatographic separation with mass spectrometric detection to identify and quantify compounds in complex samples, first demonstrated by McLafferty and Gohlke at Dow Chemical in 1955–56.", "snippet": "Chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS) couples chromatographic separation with mass spectrometric detection to identify and quantify compounds in complex samples, first demonstrated by McLafferty and Gohlke at Dow Chemical in 1955–56.", "node": "physical.chemistry.methods.specialized-chromatography-techniques.specialized-chromatography-overview", "markdown": "# Chromatography–mass spectrometry\n\nChromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS) couples chromatographic separation of a chemical mixture with mass spectrometric detection to identify and quantify its compounds in complex samples across chemistry and biology. A single run can detect and quantify many thousands of metabolite features, but identification and quantification are complicated by ion suppression, fragmentation, and isomers.[1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1) A compound is identified by combining its chromatographic retention time with its mass spectrometric signature. Peak intensities are usually relative quantities: they do not directly correlate with absolute concentrations because compounds ionize with different efficiencies, so absolute quantification requires calibration with standards.[1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1)\n\n| Key fact | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Identification basis | Retention time plus mass spectrometric signature (m/z and fragments) [1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1) |\n| Typical output | Relative quantities unless calibrated with standards; absolute quantification requires suitable calibration with standards, with isotopically labeled internal standards a strong option for correcting variation, and external calibration or standard addition among other validated approaches [1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1) • [2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11210748/) |\n| First GC-MS coupling | Fred McLafferty and Roland Gohlke at Dow Chemical, 1955–56 [3](https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry.html) |\n| EI conditions | 70 eV electron energy; spectra matched against the NIST library, which in the 2026 release (NIST26) holds 431,277 EI spectra covering 382,180 compounds [4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/) • [5](https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78963) |\n| Targeted quantification limit | 700 attograms on-column (alprazolam in precipitated plasma, triple quadrupole MRM) [6](https://sciex.com/content/dam/pdf/technotes/6500-System-for-High-Sensitivity-Analysis.pdf) |\n| Dynamic range | Two to four orders of magnitude for standard microbore LC-MS; up to 5.4 orders on a modern triple quadrupole [7](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/molecular-biosciences/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.857505/full) • [6](https://sciex.com/content/dam/pdf/technotes/6500-System-for-High-Sensitivity-Analysis.pdf) |\n| Sensitivity vs NMR | NMR detects metabolites at ≥1 µM; MS reaches the femtomolar to attomolar range [8](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5448308/) |\n\n## How it works\n\n**Separation and mass analysis are chained.** A metabolomics-style run has five steps: sample preparation and extraction; separation by chromatography (GC or LC), or in a separate workflow by electrophoresis as in [CE-MS](https://www.edgepedia.org/capillary-electrophoresis-mass-spectrometry); ionization in an ion source; separation of ions by a mass analyzer according to their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio; and detection.[1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1) A mass spectrometer consists of an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector; only charged ions are sorted and detected, while neutrals go undetected.[4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/) In a quadrupole filter, four rods carry direct-current and radio-frequency voltages so that only ions of a selected m/z reach the detector, which lowers noise and raises sensitivity.[9](https://www.agilent.com/en/product/liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-lc-ms/lcms-fundamentals)\n\nIn GC-MS, electron ionization (EI) at typically 70 eV produces reproducible fragment patterns that support qualitative identification by library matching.[4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/) In LC-MS, electrospray ionization (ESI) and [atmospheric pressure chemical ionization](https://www.edgepedia.org/atmospheric-pressure-chemical-ionization) (APCI) are soft techniques that leave the molecular ion largely intact, so LC-MS spectra are less reproducible between instruments than EI spectra.[4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/) ESI produces multiply charged ions; for a protonated ion \\( [M+n\\mathrm{H}]^{n+} \\) with neutral mass \\( M \\), \\( m/z = (M + n m_{\\mathrm H})/n \\), where \\( m_{\\mathrm H} \\) is the proton mass, and the ion mass is in general divided by its charge number; isotope peaks of an n-charged ion are spaced \\( 1/n \\) m/z apart, which extends the effective mass range.[10](https://sklmqcm.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UoM_LCMSMS_20250319.pdf)\n\nChromatographic separation is what makes the identification trustworthy: it supports isomer identification, reduces ion suppression, and improves detection of low-abundance compounds.[7](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/molecular-biosciences/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.857505/full) Coupling directly at vacuum is impractical: water at 0.1 mL/min from a small column generates about 135 cm³/min of gas at atmospheric pressure, which motivated atmospheric-pressure interfaces.[5](https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78963)\n\n## How it is done\n\n**Sample preparation comes first.** For complex matrices, preparation typically involves protein precipitation, solid-phase extraction, liquid-liquid extraction, affinity enrichment, or derivatization to increase volatility, thermal stability, and ionization efficiency.[4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/) GC-MS additionally requires derivatization to make metabolites volatile before injection.[11](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12953-025-00241-8) In LC-MS, [hydrophilic interaction chromatography](https://www.edgepedia.org/hydrophilic-interaction-chromatography) (HILIC) columns separate polar and ionic metabolites, while C18 reverse-phase columns suit non-polar metabolites such as lipids.[11](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12953-025-00241-8) Isotopically labeled internal standards are the gold standard for absolute quantitation because they share chemical characteristics, extraction efficiency, co-eluting retention times, and response factors with the unlabeled analyte.[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11210748/)\n\n[Data processing](https://www.edgepedia.org/data-processing) converts raw files to open formats (mzXML, [NetCDF](https://www.edgepedia.org/netcdf), and mzData) and uses software such as XCMS, MetaboAnalyst, MAVEN, GNPS, SIRIUS, MS-DIAL, and MZmine, with identification against databases including METLIN, HMDB, MassBank, GMD, LIPID Maps, and ChEBI.[11](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12953-025-00241-8) For EI spectra, library matching against the NIST Mass Spectral Library remains the workhorse; the 2026 release (NIST26) holds 431,277 EI spectra.[5](https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78963)\n\nThe ionization source is chosen to match the analytes. ESI ionizes in solution and suits polar, thermally labile compounds; a high voltage, given as 1.5–5 kV in one account and about ±3 to 5 kV in another, is applied at the capillary tip to generate charged droplets.[5](https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78963) • [12](https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_document_file/technical/primers/13484/jpo118059.pdf) APCI vaporizes solvent and sample at about 400 °C and ionizes via corona-discharge-generated reagent ions, suiting less polar, thermally stable compounds.[10](https://sklmqcm.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UoM_LCMSMS_20250319.pdf) • [12](https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_document_file/technical/primers/13484/jpo118059.pdf) APPI extends coverage to non-polar compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.[12](https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_document_file/technical/primers/13484/jpo118059.pdf) In practice, ESI is selected for high-polarity compounds such as drugs and pesticides, while APCI and APPI are selected for lower-polarity compounds such as polycyclic aromatics and mycotoxins.[12](https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_document_file/technical/primers/13484/jpo118059.pdf)\n\n## Origin\n\nA. T. James and A. J. P. Martin developed gas-liquid chromatography at the National Institute for Medical Research in London in the early 1950s.[3](https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry.html) The coupling of GC with MS was demonstrated in [Midland, Michigan](https://www.edgepedia.org/midland-michigan), using a Bendix time-of-flight mass spectrometer, with results presented at the ACS April 1956 national meeting, and the first journal article on GC-MS published in Analytical Chemistry in 1959.[3](https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry.html) • [13](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jssc.70411) Bendix marketed a GC-MS device from 1959, but the first commercial success was LKB's Model 9000 in 1965.[3](https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry.html)\n\nLC-MS took longer because liquid flows overload vacuum sources. Baldwin and McLafferty reported the direct liquid introduction (DLI) interface with chemical ionization in 1973.[14](https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210070913) • [13](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jssc.70411) Carroll, Dzidic, Stillwell, Haegele, and Horning reported the corona-discharge APCI source for LC-MS in 1975.[15](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60364a031) Thermospray, the first charged-droplet source to be widely used, was reported by Blakley and Vestal in Analytical Chemistry in 1983.[16](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a036) Yamashita and Fenn reported the electrospray ion source in 1984 [17](https://doi.org/10.1021/j150664a002), and Bruins, Covey, and Henion the pneumatically assisted ion-spray interface in 1987.[18](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00149a003) Fenn, Mann, Meng, Wong, and Whitehouse showed in Science in 1989 that ESI handles large biomolecules through multiple charging [19](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2675315); Fenn received the [Nobel Prize in Chemistry](https://www.edgepedia.org/nobel-prize-in-chemistry) in 2002 for electrospray MS.[20](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11747-z) Wilm and Mann described the nanoelectrospray source in 1996 [21](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9509519), and Robb, Covey, and Bruins introduced atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) for LC-MS in 2000.[22](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0001636)\n\n## Variants\n\n**GC-MS and LC-MS dominate routine practice.** GC-MS suits volatile, thermally stable compounds after derivatization; LC-MS covers polar and labile species under atmospheric-pressure ionization. UPLC uses sub-2 µm particles at pressures on the order of 10,000 psi, giving higher efficiency at higher linear velocities.[23](https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2004/new-paradigm-for-metabolism-studies-uplc-qtof.html)\n\nAnalyzer choice defines the workflow. Triple quadrupoles are ideal for targeted analysis and sensitive quantification in LC-MS/MS [11](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12953-025-00241-8), while TOF and Orbitrap analyzers enable deeper qualitative assessment through high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) measurement, with Q-TOF and Q-Orbitrap hybrids broadening applications.[24](https://ijpsdronline.com/index.php/journal/article/view/11134)\n\nIn GC×GC, the entire first-dimension eluate is cut into adjacent fractions and re-separated on a short second-dimension column, typically 0.5–2 m × 0.1 mm I.D., within the first-dimension run time.[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967308000216) Second-dimension peaks are 100–600 ms wide, so [time-of-flight detectors](https://www.edgepedia.org/time-of-flight-detector) acquiring 50 or more spectra per second are preferred.[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967308000216) Liu and Phillips introduced the on-column thermal modulator for comprehensive two-dimensional GC in 1991 [26](https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/29.6.227); Frysinger and Gaines applied GC×GC with MS detection to petroleum in 1999 [27](https://doi.org/10.1002/%28sici%291521-4168%2819990501%2922:5<251::aid-jhrc251>3.0.co;2-v), and Hope, Prazen, Nilsson, Lidstrom, and Synovec reported GC×GC/TOF-MS of trimethylsilyl-derivatized metabolites in rye grass in 2004, the first application to metabolites in real samples.[28](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.025)\n\n## Applications\n\n**Routine use spans biology, medicine, industry, and the environment.** In metabolomics, the MEGA LC-MS/MS assay quantifies 721 metabolites in serum and plasma across 20 classes using MRM with isotopic standards and multi-point calibration in a 96-well format.[29](https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/14/11/622) Pharmaceutical analysis relies on UPLC-MS/MS for high-throughput quantification of drug mixtures in plasma.[30](https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2005/high-throughput-quantitative-analysis-for-a-drug-mixture-comparing-uplc-ms-ms-and-hplc-ms-ms.html) GC×GC-MS is applied to food, flavors and fragrances, essential oils, alcoholic beverages, biological samples, organohalogen contaminants, environmental studies, and petrochemical products.[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967308000216)\n\n## Limitations and alternatives\n\n**Matrix effects are the central quantitative weakness.** Matrix effects are defined as the combined effects of all sample components other than the analyte on the measurement; when co-eluting species alter ionization efficiency they cause ion suppression or enhancement.[31](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/13/3047) Suppression arises in part because electrolyte ions compete with analyte for charge and occupation of the droplet surface, so response falls as concentrations of certain mobile-phase additives rise.[10](https://sklmqcm.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UoM_LCMSMS_20250319.pdf) Matrix-dependent suppression or enhancement affects limit of detection, limit of quantification, linearity, accuracy, and precision, and must be tested during validation.[32](https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20298) There is no universal solution; the main strategies are sample preparation, improved chromatographic and mass spectrometric conditions, and compensating calibration.[32](https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20298) A stable-isotope internal standard does not always compensate for matrix effects.[32](https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20298) APCI is less prone to matrix effects than ESI because it ionizes neutral analyte in the gas phase rather than the liquid phase.[1](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1) • [31](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/13/3047)\n\nAgainst NMR, MS is far more sensitive (femtomolar to attomolar versus ≥1 µM) but quantitation is harder, and upwards of 40% of chemical libraries are not observable by MS because metabolites must readily ionize; NMR needs minimal sample handling and is easily quantitative, making the two highly complementary.[8](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5448308/) Coupling LC to EI itself remains difficult: direct liquid introduction and particle-beam interfaces demonstrated the adverse role of the mobile phase on the EI process, with sensitivity issues never completely resolved.[33](https://ora.uniurb.it/handle/11576/2683422)\n\n## References\n\n1. [Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: a guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices | Nature Methods](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01197-1)\n2. [Challenges and recent advances in quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolomics](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11210748/)\n3. [History of the combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry - American Chemical Society](https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry.html)\n4. [Mass Spectrometer - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589702/)\n5. [Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Chromatography toward Separation and Identification of Organic Mixtures | IntechOpen](https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78963)\n6. [The SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 and QTRAP 6500 Systems for Targeted Quantitation](https://sciex.com/content/dam/pdf/technotes/6500-System-for-High-Sensitivity-Analysis.pdf)\n7. [Systematic Investigation of LC Miniaturization to Increase Sensitivity in Wide-Target LC-MS-Based Trace Bioanalysis of Small Molecules](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/molecular-biosciences/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.857505/full)\n8. [Beyond the Paradigm: Combining Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Metabolomics](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5448308/)\n9. [Basics of LC/MS - a primer | Agilent](https://www.agilent.com/en/product/liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-lc-ms/lcms-fundamentals)\n10. [Introduction to LC-MS/MS technique (Waters training, Xevo TQ-S micro)](https://sklmqcm.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UoM_LCMSMS_20250319.pdf)\n11. [Mass-spectrometry based metabolomics: an overview of workflows, strategies, data analysis and applications | Proteome Science](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12953-025-00241-8)\n12. [Fundamental LCMS Principle Guide (Shimadzu)](https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/pim/pim_document_file/technical/primers/13484/jpo118059.pdf)\n13. [From Columns to Clouds: Emerging Interfaces and Ion Sources for Coupling Analytical Separations With Mass Spectrometry (Journal of Separation Science, 2026)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jssc.70411)\n14. [M. A. Baldwin, F. W. McLafferty (1973). Liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry interface–I: The direct introduction of liquid solutions into a chemical ionization mass spectrometer. Organic Mass Spectrometry.](https://doi.org/10.1002/oms.1210070913)\n15. [D. I. Carroll and colleagues (1975). Atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry. Corona discharge ion source for use in a liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer-computer analytical system. Analytical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60364a031)\n16. [C. R. Blakley, M. L. Vestal (1983). Thermospray interface for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a036)\n17. [Masamichi Yamashita, John B. Fenn (1984). Electrospray ion source. Another variation on the free-jet theme. The Journal of Physical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/j150664a002)\n18. [Andries P. Bruins, Thomas R. Covey, Jack D. Henion (1987). Ion spray interface for combined liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00149a003)\n19. [John B. Fenn and colleagues (1989). Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules. Science.](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2675315)\n20. [The ever expanding scope of electrospray mass spectrometry, a 30 year journey | Nature Communications](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11747-z)\n21. [Matthias Wilm, Matthias Mann (1996). Analytical Properties of the Nanoelectrospray Ion Source. Analytical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9509519)\n22. [Damon B. Robb, Thomas R. Covey, Andries P. Bruins (2000). Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization: An Ionization Method for Liquid Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0001636)\n23. [A New Paradigm for Metabolism Studies: UPLC/Q-Tof | Waters](https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2004/new-paradigm-for-metabolism-studies-uplc-qtof.html)\n24. [Advances in LC–MS Mass Analyzers: A Comprehensive Review of Quadrupole, TOF, Orbitrap, and Emerging Hybrid Platforms](https://ijpsdronline.com/index.php/journal/article/view/11134)\n25. [Recent developments in the application of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (Adahchour et al., J. Chromatogr. A)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967308000216)\n26. [Z. Liu, J. B. Phillips (1991). Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography using an On-Column Thermal Modulator Interface. Journal of Chromatographic Science.](https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/29.6.227)\n27. [(sici)1521 4168(19990501)22:5<251::aid jhrc251>3.0.co (doi.org)](https://doi.org/10.1002/%28sici%291521-4168%2819990501%2922:5<251::aid-jhrc251>3.0.co;2-v)\n28. [J HOPE and colleagues (2004). Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry detection: analysis of amino acid and organic acid trimethylsilyl derivatives, with application to the analysis of metabolites in rye grass samples. Talanta.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.06.025)\n29. [A Comprehensive LC–MS Metabolomics Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Serum and Plasma (MEGA)](https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/14/11/622)\n30. [High Throughput Quantitative Analysis for a Drug Mixture: Comparing UPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-MS/MS](https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2005/high-throughput-quantitative-analysis-for-a-drug-mixture-comparing-uplc-ms-ms-and-hplc-ms-ms.html)\n31. [Compensate for or Minimize Matrix Effects? Strategies for Overcoming Matrix Effects in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Technique: A Tutorial Review](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/13/3047)\n32. [An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Trufelli et al., Mass Spectrometry Reviews 30:491–509, 2011)](https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20298)\n33. [The history of electron ionization in LC-MS, from the early days to modern technologies: A review (Famiglini, Palma, Termopoli, Cappiello, 2021)](https://ora.uniurb.it/handle/11576/2683422)\n\n---\n*Topic: Encyclopedia › Physical world and mathematics › Chemistry › Chemical principles and methods › Analytical chemistry › Chromatography › Specialized chromatography techniques › Specialized and hyphenated chromatography (overview)*\n\n*Initially written Sep 29, 2026 · Reviewed: Sep 30, 2026 · Edited: Sep 30, 2026 · Last review: Sep 30, 2026*\n\n*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*\n\nLicense: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\n", "same_as": [], "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry", "markdown_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry.md", "license": { "name": "Edgepedia Community License 1.0", "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license", "summary": "Free with credit, commercial use included. AI training is open to everyone. For other uses, organizations over USD 100M in revenue or 100M monthly users license separately.", "spdx": "LicenseRef-Edgepedia-Community-1.0" }, "credit": "\"Chromatography–mass spectrometry\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.", "credit_md": "\"[Chromatography–mass spectrometry](https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry)\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), [https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry](https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry). [Edgepedia Community License 1.0](https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license).", "credit_html": "\"Chromatography–mass spectrometry\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/chromatography-mass-spectrometry. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.", "speakable": "Chromatography–mass spectrometry couples chromatographic separation with mass spectrometric detection to identify and quantify compounds in complex samples, first demonstrated by McLafferty and Gohlke at Dow Chemical in 1955–56." }