{ "id": "ep6tmf4ycn", "slug": "dehydrogenative-coupling", "title": "Dehydrogenative coupling", "updated": "2026-10-15", "topic_path": [ { "id": "physical", "label": "Physical world and mathematics", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry", "label": "Chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods", "label": "Chemical principles and methods", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods" }, { "id": "physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis", "label": "Chemical synthesis", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis" } ], "geo": [ { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis", "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000: Chemical synthesis", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis", "path": [ { "id": "geo.nongeo", "label": "Non-geographic", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946", "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical", "label": "Physical world and mathematics", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry", "label": "Chemistry", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods", "label": "Chemical principles and methods", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods" }, { "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis", "label": "Chemical synthesis", "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis" } ] } ], "excerpt": "Dehydrogenative coupling, also known as cross-dehydrogenative coupling, is a bond-forming chemical reaction that joins C–H bonds directly without prefunctionalized partners, pioneered by Zhiping Li and Chao-Jun Li in 2004.", "snippet": "Dehydrogenative coupling, also known as cross-dehydrogenative coupling, is a bond-forming chemical reaction that joins C–H bonds directly without prefunctionalized partners, pioneered by Zhiping Li and Chao-Jun Li in 2004.", "node": "physical.chemistry.methods.chemical-synthesis", "markdown": "# Dehydrogenative coupling\n\nDehydrogenative coupling is a bond-forming reaction in which two C–H bonds, or a C–H bond and an X–H bond (X = N, O, P, S, B, or Si), are joined with formal or actual removal of molecular hydrogen, so neither coupling partner needs a prefunctionalized leaving group such as Br, I, OTf, SiR₃, SnR₃, or BR₂.[1](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2026.08.002) • [2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf) • [3](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564) The best-known form, cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC), forms C–C bonds directly from two different C–H bonds and has been demonstrated for sp³–sp³, sp³–sp², sp³–sp, sp²–sp², sp²–sp, and sp–sp combinations.[4](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/sc/c7sc01045a) The same logic extends to C–heteroatom bond formation with direct functionalization of C–H bonds.[5](https://science-of-synthesis.thieme.com/app/text/?id=SD-240-00131)\n\n| Key fact | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Definition | New bond formed from two C–H (or C–H/X–H) partners by formal or actual \\( H_{2} \\) removal[1](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2026.08.002) • [2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf) |\n| Bond types | C–C (sp³–sp³ through sp–sp), C–N, C–O, C–S, C–Si[4](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/sc/c7sc01045a) • [2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf) |\n| Fate of hydrogen | Removed by an oxidant (giving water or oxidant-derived waste) in oxidative CDC; released as \\( H_{2} \\) in acceptorless and electrocatalytic variants[3](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564) • [6](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9) |\n| Typical catalysts and oxidants | Cu, Fe, and Pd salts with TBHP, \\( H_{2} \\)\\( O_{2} \\), \\( O_{2} \\), DDQ, peroxides, iodine reagents[2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf) • [7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531) |\n| Founding papers | Zhiping Li and Chao-Jun Li, JACS 2004 (alkynylation of sp³ C–H adjacent to N) and JACS 2005 (first sp³–sp³ CDC)[8](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0460763) • [9](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja050058j) |\n| Activation difficulty | Alkane C–H bond dissociation energy ≈ 100 kcal/mol[10](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006) |\n| Recent direction | Paired electrocatalysis with \\( H_{2} \\) as byproduct, 84 substrate examples[6](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9) |\n\n## How it works\n\n**Where the hydrogen goes.** Although the reaction is written as loss of \\( H_{2} \\), in oxidative CDC molecular hydrogen is not the byproduct; the two hydrogen atoms are removed by a base, solvent, counter-ion, or oxidizing agent.[3](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564) Mechanistically, the reactants release two electrons that are trapped by an oxidant, keeping the process electroneutral.[11](https://pubs.acs.org/accacs/article/8/2/1161/741132/Oxidative-Coupling-Mechanisms-Current-State-of) Most CDC reactions use stoichiometric oxidants such as PhI(OAc)₂, benzoquinone, Cu(II) salts, organic peracids, or Ag(I) salts; using \\( O_{2} \\) as the sole oxidant gives water as the byproduct.[12](https://sioc-journal.cn/Jwk_yjhx/EN/10.6023/cjoc202007007) Acceptorless variants instead release \\( H_{2} \\), for example a paired electrocatalytic protocol that combines hydrogen-evolution catalysis with hydride transfer on a cobalt–salen catalyst.[6](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9)\n\n**Mechanistic families.** In metal-mediated oxidative coupling, concerted metalation–deprotonation (CMD), in which a carboxylate base bound to the metal assists deprotonation, is the most common [C–H activation](https://www.edgepedia.org/c-h-activation) mode.[11](https://pubs.acs.org/accacs/article/8/2/1161/741132/Oxidative-Coupling-Mechanisms-Current-State-of) In radical pathways, an oxidant-generated radical performs single-electron transfer (SET) on the substrate to give a radical cation, then a cationic intermediate attacked by the nucleophile.[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531) For unactivated alkanes (C–H BDE ≈ 100 kcal/mol), oxygen-centered radicals (BDE 105 kcal/mol for the OH of tert-butanol) are the most common hydrogen-atom-transfer agents, with di-tert-butyl peroxide dominating as precursor[10](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006); in Li's iron-catalyzed variant, homolysis of tBuO–OtBu generates tert-butoxy radicals that abstract benzylic hydrogen, and the benzyl radical attacks a chelated Fe-enolate.[13](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/2/250) Ionic iminium pathways also operate: in the CuBr/TBHP coupling of tetrahydroisoquinolines, a BHT radical-scavenger test still gave product in 70% yield, so a free-radical process is not required; an iminium intermediate whose reaction with the pronucleophile is rate-limiting is most likely.[14](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601687103) In acceptorless nickel silylation, the cycle is oxidative addition of HSi(OEt)₃ and the alkylarene on Ni(0), reductive elimination to the benzylsilane, and \\( H_{2} \\) evolution.[15](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/cy/d4cy00263f)\n\n## How it is done\n\nSimple, cheap catalysts such as copper and iron salts are combined with oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide, dioxygen, tert-butylhydroperoxide, and DDQ to functionalize sp³ C–H bonds alpha to nitrogen in amines, alpha to oxygen in ethers, allylic and benzylic C–H bonds, and alkane C–H bonds, some in water.[16](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19220064/) [Oxidants](https://www.edgepedia.org/oxidizing-agent) fall into six classes: peroxides, iodine reagents (\\( I_{2} \\) and iodanes), persulfates, quinones, azo dicarboxylates, and nitrogen-based reagents; common synergistic pairs include TBAI/TBHP and PIFA or PIDA with NaN₃.[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531) Conditions scale with the pronucleophile: CuBr-catalyzed Mannich-type CDC of tetrahydroisoquinoline with nitromethane runs at room temperature, MBH and Friedel–Crafts variants at 50 °C, and alkynylation at 100 °C, or 50 °C over two days with a ligand.[14](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601687103) Palladium-catalyzed aerobic variants olefinate electron-deficient arenes and functionalize uracils and caffeines, with mono-N-protected amino acid ligands accelerating the olefination.[12](https://sioc-journal.cn/Jwk_yjhx/EN/10.6023/cjoc202007007) Representative yields are moderate to good: nickel-catalyzed coupling of benzaldehyde with N-Boc pyrrolidine using di-tert-butyl peroxide and zinc gave 62% isolated yield[17](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10915535/), and a flow photoredox/nickel coupling of alkylarenes with aldehydes reached full aldehyde conversion in 120 min under a 365 nm LED.[18](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621)\n\n## Origin\n\nThe CDC concept and name are associated with Zhiping Li and [Chao-Jun Li](https://www.edgepedia.org/chao-jun-li), whose 2004 communication in the [Journal of the American Chemical Society](https://www.edgepedia.org/journal-of-the-american-chemical-society) reported CuBr-catalyzed alkynylation of sp³ C–H bonds adjacent to a nitrogen atom.[8](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0460763) The first sp³–sp³ CDC, an Aza-Henry (nitro-Mannich) type coupling between two sp³ C–H bonds giving β-nitroamine derivatives, followed in 2005 in the same journal, working with as little as 2 mol% copper catalyst.[9](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja050058j) • [19](https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.200900487) The method was extended to sp³–sp² coupling by direct indolation of tetrahydroisoquinolines[20](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0516054), and in 2004 Li and Li had reported the first enantioselective CDC of prochiral sp³ C–H bonds, alkynylating N-phenyl tetrahydroisoquinolines in [Organic Letters](https://www.edgepedia.org/organic-letters).[21](https://doi.org/10.1021/ol047814v) A 2006 PNAS account by Zhiping Li, D. Scott Bohle, and Chao-Jun Li consolidated the strategy[14](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601687103), and an independent review credits Li and co-workers with pioneering the seminal catalytic coupling of unfunctionalized C–H bonds.[19](https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.200900487) An important precursor was Shun-Ichi Murahashi and colleagues' 2003 aerobic ruthenium-catalyzed oxidative cyanation of tertiary amines with sodium cyanide, published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.[22](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0390303) Li's 2008 Accounts of Chemical Research review surveyed the matured methodology. One point remains unsettled: a Trends in Chemistry review states CDC between two different C–H bonds was developed, while Li's own perspective dates the concept's establishment to the 2004–2005 papers; both are cited here without resolution.[10](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006)\n\n## Variants\n\nNamed and mechanistic variants span the oxidant spectrum. [Acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling](https://www.edgepedia.org/acceptorless-dehydrogenative-coupling) releases \\( H_{2} \\): a CeO₂-supported Ni(0) nanocatalyst performs undirected, regioselective acceptorless dehydrogenative silylation of primary benzylic C(sp³)–H bonds with triethoxysilane at 120 °C, giving benzylsilanes with under 1% aryl C(sp²)–H silylation.[15](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/cy/d4cy00263f) Photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution cross-couplings of benzene [C–H amination](https://www.edgepedia.org/c-h-amination) and hydroxylation were reported by Yi-Wen Zheng and colleagues in 2016[23](https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05498), and photo-induced oxidant-free C–H/N–H coupling between arenes and azoles by Linbin Niu and colleagues in 2017.[24](https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14226) Metal-free CDC avoids transition-metal cost and metal impurities in drug products.[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531) Enantioselective CDC remains a small share: a survey found only 6% of CDC papers since 2009 involve enantioselective synthesis[2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf), although [Kang Liang](https://www.edgepedia.org/kang-liang), Qinglin Zhang, and Chang Guo reported enantioselective nickel-catalyzed electrochemical cross-dehydrogenative amination in 2023[25](https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00372-w), and enantioselective C(sp³)–N and C(sp³)–O formation via copper catalysis, including dual photo/copper and electrochemical variants, has since emerged with a common mechanistic manifold as a design guideline.[1](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2026.08.002) CDC polymerization builds alternating donor–acceptor conjugated copolymers from unfunctionalized monomers, mostly with Pd catalysts and Ag oxidants; its alkenylation variant is based on palladium-catalyzed oxidative olefination of arenes with alkenes.[26](https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202301247) Direct C–H/Si–H coupling is an attractive route to arylsilanes, valuable intermediates for biaryl synthesis, from cost and environmental standpoints.[27](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yukigoseikyokaishi/75/1/75_64/_article) Recent work has shifted toward oxidant-free hydrogen management: a paired electrocatalytic CDC of alcohols with allylic or benzylic C–H bonds, using a pentacoordinated Co-salen hydrogen-evolution catalyst with TEMPO, gave the C–C coupling product in 85% yield with exclusive C–C coupling selectivity across 84 examples, with hydrogen as a valuable byproduct[6](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9), and single-platinum-atom-decorated graphitic carbon nitride (Pt-g-\\( C_{3} \\)\\( N_{4} \\)) serves as a recyclable heterogeneous photocatalyst for hydrogen-evolution CDC of (hetero)arenes with nucleophiles, stable over 10 cycles with platinum leaching below 0.02 ppm.[28](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41929-025-01450-2) Iron CDC has adopted mechanochemistry: high-speed ball milling in solvent-free systems now allows room-temperature reactions with high yields, and magnetic nanocatalysts such as Fe₃\\( O_{4} \\) and CuFe₂\\( O_{4} \\) are magnetically recoverable.[13](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/2/250)\n\n## Applications\n\nCDC polymerization synthesizes alternating donor–acceptor conjugated copolymers directly from unfunctionalized arene/heteroarene or arene/alkene monomers, avoiding the prefunctionalization used in Stille, Suzuki, Kumada, and direct arylation polymerization.[26](https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202301247) In pharmaceutical synthesis, a single-platinum-atom photocatalyst enables late-stage functionalization of pharmaceuticals and optoelectronic materials and decagram-scale drug synthesis in a high-speed circulation flow system.[28](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41929-025-01450-2) Flow photoredox scale-up produced 10.5 g of a ketone product in 50% overall yield using only 640 mg of iridium photocatalyst thanks to 90%-recovery recycling.[18](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621) The substrate scope, covering amines, ethers, allylic and benzylic C–H bonds, and alkanes, some in water, underpins use in fine-chemical and heterocycle synthesis.[16](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19220064/)\n\n## Limitations and alternatives\n\nClassical cross-couplings require coupling partners bearing leaving groups (Br, I, OTf, SiR₃, SnR₃, BR₂), so extra steps are needed to prepare the functionalized starting materials[3](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564); they also generate stoichiometric metal-salt waste, for example Zn in Negishi, Sn in Stille, Mg in Kumada, and B in Suzuki couplings.[19](https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.200900487) CDC removes that prefunctionalization requirement but has its own limits. Substrate choice is often restricted: a heteroatom, usually nitrogen or oxygen and in some examples sulfur, alpha to the coupled carbon is needed as a directing or activating group.[19](https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.200900487) Palladium-catalyzed aryl oxidative couplings have been dogged by slow reaction rates, low yields and conversions, and poor regioselectivities, often giving complex mixtures.[3](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564) Selectivity challenges include homocoupling, regioselectivity, and overfunctionalization.[10](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006) For oxidative aryl CH–CH cross-coupling, Kočovský and coworkers postulated that the coupling partners' redox potentials must differ by \\( \\Delta E_{\\mathrm{p}} \\geq 0.25 \\) V.[2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf) Stoichiometric oxidant waste remains unavoidable in most cases, limiting true greenness even under metal-free conditions.[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531) In polymer synthesis, molecular weights up to \\( M_{\\mathrm{n}} = 55{,}800 \\) have been reached, but making high molecular weight polymer is inconsistent and homocoupling defects are prevalent.[26](https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202301247) Even electrocatalytic variants have scope limits: toluene, 4-methyl anisole, hexene, and 4-phenyl-1-butene failed as substrates in the paired-electrocatalysis protocol because of their less acidic C–H bonds.[6](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9)\n\n## References\n\n1. [Enantioselective cross-dehydrogenative C(sp3)–heteroatom bond formation via copper catalysis (Trends in Chemistry, 2026)](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2026.08.002)\n2. [New Trends in Enantioselective Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling (review, 2020; Semantic Scholar PDF copy, no publisher page retrieved)](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c53/365e74392d916aef38b1021cdc06c12baa50.pdf)\n3. [Recent advancements in dehydrogenative cross coupling reactions for C–C bond formation (Tetrahedron)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403917300564)\n4. [Cross-dehydrogenative coupling and oxidative-amination reactions of ethers and alcohols with aromatics and heteroaromatics (Chemical Science, 2017)](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/sc/c7sc01045a)\n5. [Science of Synthesis: Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling (Ali, Guin, Maiti, 2023, Thieme)](https://science-of-synthesis.thieme.com/app/text/?id=SD-240-00131)\n6. [Paired electrocatalysis unlocks cross-dehydrogenative coupling of C(sp3)-H bonds using a pentacoordinated cobalt-salen catalyst (Nature Communications, 2024)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47220-9)\n7. [An account on selective functionalization of C(sp3)-H bonds by oxidative cross dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reactions under transition-metal free condition (2025)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352554125000531)\n8. [Zhiping Li, Chao-Jun Li (2004). CuBr-Catalyzed Efficient Alkynylation of sp3 C−H Bonds Adjacent to a Nitrogen Atom. Journal of the American Chemical Society.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0460763)\n9. [Zhiping Li, Chao-Jun Li (2005). Highly Efficient Copper-Catalyzed Nitro-Mannich Type Reaction: Cross-Dehydrogenative-Coupling between sp 3 C−H Bond and sp 3 C−H Bond. Journal of the American Chemical Society.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja050058j)\n10. [Cross-dehydrogenative coupling of unactivated alkanes (Trends in Chemistry, 2022)](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006)\n11. [Oxidative Coupling Mechanisms: Current State of Understanding (ACS Catalysis)](https://pubs.acs.org/accacs/article/8/2/1161/741132/Oxidative-Coupling-Mechanisms-Current-State-of)\n12. [Recent Advances in Cross-Dehydrogenative-Coupling Reactions Using Molecular Oxygen as the Sole Oxidant (Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry)](https://sioc-journal.cn/Jwk_yjhx/EN/10.6023/cjoc202007007)\n13. [Iron-Catalyzed Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling (Molecules, 2025)](https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/2/250)\n14. [Zhiping Li, D. Scott Bohle, Chao-Jun Li (2006). Cu-catalyzed cross-dehydrogenative coupling: A versatile strategy for C–C bond formations via the oxidative activation of sp 3 C–H bonds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601687103)\n15. [Ni-catalyzed undirected and regioselective acceptorless dehydrogenative silylation of primary benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds (Catal. Sci. Technol. 2024)](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/cy/d4cy00263f)\n16. [Cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC): exploring C–C bond formations beyond functional group transformations (Accounts of Chemical Research, 2008/2009)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19220064/)\n17. [Oxidative Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling of N-Heterocycles with Aldehydes through C(sp3)–H Functionalization (JACS 2023, Montgomery/Zimmerman)](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10915535/)\n18. [Photoredox-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Csp3–Csp2 Cross-Coupling of Alkylarenes to Aldehydes in Flow (J. Org. Chem.)](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621)\n19. [Beyond Traditional Cross Couplings: The Scope of the Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction (Chemistry – An Asian Journal, 2010, Scheuermann)](https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.200900487)\n20. [Zhiping Li, Chao-Jun Li (2005). CuBr-Catalyzed Direct Indolation of Tetrahydroisoquinolines via Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling between sp3 C−H and sp2 C−H Bonds. Journal of the American Chemical Society.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0516054)\n21. [Zhiping Li, Chao-Jun Li (2004). Catalytic Enantioselective Alkynylation of Prochiral sp3 C−H Bonds Adjacent to a Nitrogen Atom. Organic Letters.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ol047814v)\n22. [Shun-Ichi Murahashi and colleagues (2003). Aerobic Ruthenium-Catalyzed Oxidative Cyanation of Tertiary Amines with Sodium Cyanide. Journal of the American Chemical Society.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0390303)\n23. [Yi-Wen Zheng and colleagues (2016). Photocatalytic Hydrogen-Evolution Cross-Couplings: Benzene C–H Amination and Hydroxylation. Journal of the American Chemical Society.](https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05498)\n24. [Linbin Niu and colleagues (2017). Photo-induced oxidant-free oxidative C–H/N–H cross-coupling between arenes and azoles. Nature Communications.](https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14226)\n25. [Kang Liang, Qinglin Zhang, Chang Guo (2023). Enantioselective nickel-catalysed electrochemical cross-dehydrogenative amination. Nature Synthesis.](https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00372-w)\n26. [Cross‐Dehydrogenative Coupling Polymerization via C−H Activation for the Synthesis of Conjugated Polymers (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023)](https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202301247)\n27. [Undirected Dehydrogenative Silylation of Aromatic C-H Bond (J. Synth. Org. Chem. Japan, 2017, review)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yukigoseikyokaishi/75/1/75_64/_article)\n28. [Single-atom photocatalysis boosting oxidant-free cross-dehydrogenative couplings of (hetero)arenes with nucleophiles (Nature Catalysis, 2025)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41929-025-01450-2)\n\n---\n*Topic: Encyclopedia › Physical world and mathematics › Chemistry › Chemical principles and methods › Chemical synthesis*\n\n*Initially written Sep 29, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026*\n\n*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*\n\nLicense: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\n", "same_as": [], "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling", "markdown_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling.md", "license": { "name": "Edgepedia Community License 1.0", "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license", "summary": "Free with credit, commercial use included. AI training is open to everyone. For other uses, organizations over USD 100M in revenue or 100M monthly users license separately.", "spdx": "LicenseRef-Edgepedia-Community-1.0" }, "credit": "\"Dehydrogenative coupling\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.", "credit_md": "\"[Dehydrogenative coupling](https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling)\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), [https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling](https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling). [Edgepedia Community License 1.0](https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license).", "credit_html": "\"Dehydrogenative coupling\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/dehydrogenative-coupling. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.", "speakable": "Dehydrogenative coupling, also known as cross-dehydrogenative coupling, is a bond-forming chemical reaction that joins C–H bonds directly without prefunctionalized partners, pioneered by Zhiping Li and Chao-Jun Li in 2004." }