{
 "id": "epsanjc2g5",
 "slug": "duodenoscopy",
 "title": "Duodenoscopy",
 "updated": "2026-10-15",
 "topic_path": [
  {
   "id": "life",
   "label": "Life and health",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health",
   "label": "Human health and medicine",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical",
   "label": "Clinical assessment and procedures",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy",
   "label": "Endoscopy and biopsy procedures",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy"
  },
  {
   "id": "life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy",
   "label": "Gastrointestinal endoscopy",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy"
  }
 ],
 "geo": [
  {
   "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy",
   "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000: Gastrointestinal endoscopy",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy",
   "path": [
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo",
     "label": "Non-geographic",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946",
     "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life",
     "label": "Life and health",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health",
     "label": "Human health and medicine",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical",
     "label": "Clinical assessment and procedures",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy",
     "label": "Endoscopy and biopsy procedures",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy",
     "label": "Gastrointestinal endoscopy",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy"
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "excerpt": "Duodenoscopy is the endoscopic examination of the duodenum using a flexible scope passed through the mouth; the side-viewing duodenoscope visualizes the major papilla and serves as the platform for ERCP.",
 "snippet": "Duodenoscopy is the endoscopic examination of the duodenum using a flexible scope passed through the mouth; the side-viewing duodenoscope visualizes the major papilla and serves as the platform for ERCP.",
 "node": "life.health.clinical.clinical-endoscopy-biopsy.gastrointestinal-endoscopy",
 "markdown": "# Duodenoscopy\n\nDuodenoscopy is the endoscopic examination of the duodenum, using a flexible endoscope passed through the mouth. During routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), a forward-viewing scope inspects the duodenal bulb and second part of the duodenum as part of a general upper gastrointestinal examination. In side-viewing duodenoscopy, a purpose-built instrument is advanced to the second portion of the duodenum to visualize and cannulate the major duodenal papilla, the entry point of the bile and pancreatic ducts; this is the platform for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). More than 500,000 ERCP procedures are performed in the United States annually.<sup>[1](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)</sup>\n\n| Key fact | Value |\n|---|---|\n| ERCP volume (US) | Over 500,000 procedures per year<sup>[1](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)</sup> |\n| Field of view | 100° (side-viewing duodenoscope) vs 140° (forward-viewing gastroscope)<sup>[2](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2932-0440.pdf)</sup> |\n| Selective biliary cannulation failure | Up to 18% overall; ≤5% in experienced settings<sup>[3](https://www.esge.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/2016_s_0042_108641.pdf)</sup> |\n| ERCP complications | 5–10% risk, including pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, and GI tract injury<sup>[1](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)</sup> |\n| Duodenoscope contamination after enhanced reprocessing | Pooled 5% (95% CI 2.3–10.8%); high-risk organisms 0.8%<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8831410/)</sup> |\n| Single-use duodenoscope performance | Pooled biliary cannulation 95%; post-ERCP pancreatitis 2%; total adverse events 7%<sup>[5](https://webaigo.it/download/20260128_Cannulation%20rates%20and%20technical%20performance%20single%20use%20ERCP%20DLD%2001%2024%20%20MA.pdf)</sup> |\n| Environmental cost of disposables | CO₂ emissions approximately 20 times higher than reusable end caps, mainly from production<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup> |\n\n## How it works\n\nThe side-viewing duodenoscope differs from a gastroscope in two design features. First, its camera and working channel exit at the side of the tip rather than the end, giving a 100° field of view oriented perpendicular to the shaft, compared with the 140° forward view of a standard gastroscope.<sup>[2](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2932-0440.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[7](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/a4ab0630e9be3d0f491b3605d84f0274/PMC4751007.pdf)</sup> This lateral view is what allows an optimal view of the major duodenal papilla en face, which eases cannulation in normal anatomy.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup> The ampulla of Vater lies in the second portion of the duodenum, with the minor papilla 2 cm proximal to it; both are best visualized with a side-viewing instrument.<sup>[8](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK532268/)</sup>\n\nSecond, the scope tip carries an elevator, a lever that can be raised or lowered to change the trajectory of accessories (cannula, sphincterotome, balloon) leaving the working channel, directing them into the major or minor papilla.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[1](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)</sup> Anatomically, in approximately 90% of individuals the common bile duct and main pancreatic duct merge at the ampulla and drain through the sphincter of Oddi, so a single papillary cannulation site serves both systems.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup>\n\n## How it is done\n\nThe duodenoscope is inserted through the mouth and advanced through the esophagus and stomach to the second portion of the duodenum.<sup>[9](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8355398/)</sup> To enter the second part, the endoscope is advanced down and to the right with an upward dial; the distal duodenum is then reached by pulling back slowly while maintaining the luminal view, which straightens the scope and reduces the gastric loop.<sup>[8](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK532268/)</sup> The duodenum distal to the bulb shows distinctive circular folds, the valvulae conniventes.<sup>[8](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK532268/)</sup> Mucosal inspection and biopsy are core skills, alongside advancement into the second portion, withdrawal, and therapeutic intervention.<sup>[10](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5991610/)</sup>\n\nFor ERCP, the cannulation target is the common bile duct and/or main pancreatic duct via the major papilla.<sup>[3](https://www.esge.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/2016_s_0042_108641.pdf)</sup> Selective biliary cannulation reportedly fails in up to 18% of cases, falling to 5% or less in experienced settings.<sup>[3](https://www.esge.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/2016_s_0042_108641.pdf)</sup>\n\n## Origin\n\nDuodenoscopy followed the arrival of fiberoptics in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Indirect duodenoscopy was described soon afterward, and direct-vision fiberoptic duodenoscopes appeared later.<sup>[11](https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.13.3.170)</sup> Specialized ERCP scopes, the FDS and the JF and JFB-2 models, were designed for pancreatobiliary endoscopy.<sup>[12](https://annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo1Jan2015/V44N1p34.pdf)</sup> Peter Cotton reported his series of patients undergoing ERCP in 1972<sup>[12](https://annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo1Jan2015/V44N1p34.pdf)</sup>, and published work described endoscopic sphincterotomy, which made ERCP a therapeutic rather than purely diagnostic procedure.<sup>[12](https://annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo1Jan2015/V44N1p34.pdf)</sup>\n\n## Variants\n\nSingle-use duodenoscopes are the main recent variant. In its August 2019 safety communication the FDA recommended transitioning away from fixed-endcap duodenoscopes toward designs that facilitate or eliminate reprocessing, and it cleared the Fujifilm ED-580XT and Pentax ED34-i10T as reusable models with disposable end caps.<sup>[1](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[26](https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/reprocessing-reusable-medical-devices/infections-associated-reprocessed-duodenoscopes)</sup> In December 2019 the FDA approved the EXALT Model D ([Boston Scientific](https://www.edgepedia.org/boston-scientific)), the first fully disposable duodenoscope.<sup>[13](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7530557/)</sup> Bench testing shows comparable completion times between disposable and reusable scopes, though image quality, image stability, and air-water button functionality were rated inferior for disposables in one comparative study.<sup>[14](https://practicalgastro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Adler_Frontiers_-February-2024.pdf)</sup> All seven published economic studies found higher per-procedure cost for single-use scopes, but three cost-utility analyses found them more cost-effective overall.<sup>[15](https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/192270/1/a-2645-1463.pdf)</sup> In practice, adoption has been gradual and selective: at one large-volume tertiary center reviewing 8,375 ERCPs from July 2020 to September 2023, 267 (3.2%) used single-use scopes, with 94% technical success, adverse events in 3%, and usage rising from 2.6% of ERCPs in 2020 to 4.7% in 2023 under a tiered usage policy.<sup>[16](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12850729/)</sup>\n\nCap-assisted endoscopy, using a transparent cap on a standard front-viewing endoscope, has emerged as another variant, though the duodenoscope remains the standard for evaluating the major papilla.<sup>[17](https://www.em-consulte.com/article/1630252/efficacy-of-cap-assisted-endoscopy-for-the-visuali)</sup>\n\n## Applications\n\nTherapeutically, the duodenoscope platform supports sphincterotomy, stone extraction, stent placement, and balloon dilation. In a meta-analysis of single-use duodenoscope studies, sphincterotomy was successfully performed in all cases<sup>[5](https://webaigo.it/download/20260128_Cannulation%20rates%20and%20technical%20performance%20single%20use%20ERCP%20DLD%2001%2024%20%20MA.pdf)</sup>, and a related meta-analysis of seven studies reported success rates of 95% for cannulation, 100% for sphincterotomy and stone clearance, 97% for stent placement, and 97% for balloon dilation.<sup>[14](https://practicalgastro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Adler_Frontiers_-February-2024.pdf)</sup> Endoscopic [ampullectomy](https://www.edgepedia.org/ampullectomy) can resect benign ampullary adenomas that do not show adenomatous ingrowth of 1 cm or more into the common bile duct or pancreatic duct.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup>\n\nDirect cholangioscopy is built on the same platform: an ERCP is first performed with a duodenoscope, the bile duct cannulated and contrast injected, and a sphincterotomy performed if not previously done.<sup>[18](https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/archives/july-2016/an-overview-of-the-evolution-of-direct-cholangioscopy-techniques-for-diagnosis-and-therapy/)</sup> Post-2023 European consensus on direct cholangioscopy recommends over-the-wire introduction of the cholangioscope, avoiding excessive elevator use, and locking the duodenoscope steering wheels after cholangioscope introduction.<sup>[19](https://www.ovid.com/journals/uegj/fulltext/10.1002/ueg2.70123~european-consensus-recommendations-for-direct-cholangioscopy)</sup>\n\n## Limitations and alternatives\n\nThe same features that make the duodenoscope effective complicate its cleaning. The elevator adds mechanical complexity, and high-temperature sterilization is not feasible for these devices.<sup>[20](https://www.e-ce.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5946%2Fce.2021.075)</sup> Areas around and beneath the elevator act as a reservoir for bacteria that cannot always be adequately reprocessed with current technology<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup>, and design \"blind spots\" allow debris and bacterial flora to gather and serve as a source of microbial transmission.<sup>[20](https://www.e-ce.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5946%2Fce.2021.075)</sup> Outbreaks have involved [Klebsiella pneumoniae](https://www.edgepedia.org/klebsiella-pneumoniae), [Pseudomonas aeruginosa](https://www.edgepedia.org/pseudomonas-aeruginosa), and, more recently, carbapenem-resistant [Enterobacteriaceae](https://www.edgepedia.org/enterobacteriaceae).<sup>[21](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373446/)</sup>\n\nThe quantified risk is low but not zero. In Dutch data from 2008 to 2018, three outbreaks produced 21 confirmed duodenoscope-associated infections and 52 confirmed colonizations among an estimated 204,170 ERCPs, a minimum estimated infection risk of approximately 0.01% per procedure; none of the 21 infection cases resulted in death.<sup>[22](https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1467-6294.pdf)</sup> In 2015 the US FDA recommended supplemental enhanced surveillance and reprocessing techniques: [microbiological culture](https://www.edgepedia.org/microbiological-culture), ethylene oxide sterilization, liquid chemical sterilant processing systems, and double high-level disinfection.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8831410/)</sup> Even with these measures, a meta-analysis of 9,084 post-reprocessing cultures found a pooled contamination rate of 5% (95% CI 2.3–10.8%), with high-risk organisms at 0.8%.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8831410/)</sup> In one tertiary hospital's 8-year review of 404 culture sets, yearly contamination rates with microbial growth organisms ranged from 14.3% to 47.5%, and audits, automated endoscope reprocessor replacement, and disposable caps showed no clear association with lower contamination.<sup>[23](https://gut.bmj.com/content/73/4/613)</sup>\n\nThe side view also has a diagnostic blind spot. In a blinded tandem prospective trial, clinically significant findings were missed on side-viewing examination in 37 of 163 patients (22.7%), and comorbid malignancy predicted missed findings (30.4% vs 12.7%, p = 0.008).<sup>[2](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2932-0440.pdf)</sup> [Capsule endoscopy](https://www.edgepedia.org/capsule-endoscopy) data point the same way: among 2,217 small-bowel capsule studies, gastroduodenal abnormalities were detected in 31.4%, and in patients with a prior upper endoscopy, duodenal lesions were new findings in 16.8%.<sup>[24](https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/diges/v110n2/1130-0108-diges-110-02-00102.pdf)</sup>\n\nIn altered anatomy, the side-viewer loses its advantage. After Billroth II gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y surgery, the afferent loop entrance is hidden, angulated, and elongated, and forward-viewing endoscopes and double-balloon enteroscopes may be used instead.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup> A meta-analysis of seven observational studies in Billroth II gastrectomy (about 350 patients, 727 procedures) found no significant differences between cap-assisted forward-viewing ERCP and side-viewing duodenoscope ERCP in biliary cannulation, clinical success, or overall adverse events, though post-ERCP pancreatitis showed a nonsignificant numerical increase with the forward-viewing approach (14.5% vs 6.7%; RR 2.11; 95% CI 0.90–4.92).<sup>[25](https://www.em-consulte.com/article/1831037/forward-viewing-endoscopy-with-cap-fitting-versus-)</sup>\n\nThe environmental trade-off of the single-use variant is substantial: CO₂ emissions are approximately 20 times higher with disposable duodenoscopes than with reusable end caps, mainly due to production.<sup>[6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)</sup>\n\n## References\n\n1. [Reducing the Risk of Infection from Reprocessed Duodenoscopes (FDA Advisory Committee Executive Summary, Nov 2019)](https://lfm-hcs.com/FDA/FDA_Nov2019_ExSum_duoden.pdf)\n2. [Forward-Viewing Endoscopy at the Time of ERCP: A Blinded Tandem Prospective Trial](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2932-0440.pdf)\n3. [Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: ESGE Clinical Guideline](https://www.esge.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/2016_s_0042_108641.pdf)\n4. [Contamination Rates in Duodenoscopes Reprocessed Using Enhanced Surveillance and Reprocessing Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8831410/)\n5. [Cannulation rates and technical performance evaluation of commercially available single-use duodenoscopes for ERCP: A systematic review and meta-analysis](https://webaigo.it/download/20260128_Cannulation%20rates%20and%20technical%20performance%20single%20use%20ERCP%20DLD%2001%2024%20%20MA.pdf)\n6. [Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography - StatPearls](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493160/)\n7. [Performing forward-viewing endoscopy at time of pancreaticobiliary EUS and ERCP may detect additional upper gastrointestinal lesions (PMC4751007)](https://rcastoragev2.blob.core.windows.net/a4ab0630e9be3d0f491b3605d84f0274/PMC4751007.pdf)\n8. [Esophagogastroduodenoscopy - StatPearls](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK532268/)\n9. [Large Balloon Anchor Technique for ERCP Required for Esophagogastroduodenal Deformities](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8355398/)\n10. [EGD core curriculum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5991610/)\n11. [Endoscopic examination of the duodenal bulb: clinical evaluation of forward- and side-viewing fibreoptic systems in 200 cases](https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.13.3.170)\n12. [Seeing Better, Doing Better, Evolution and Application of GI Endoscopy (24th Seah Cheng Siang Lecture)](https://annals.edu.sg/pdf/44VolNo1Jan2015/V44N1p34.pdf)\n13. [Duodenoscope-related infections and potential role of single-use duodenoscopes](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7530557/)\n14. [Disposable Endoscopes: Current Status and Future Directions (Practical Gastroenterology, Feb 2024)](https://practicalgastro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Adler_Frontiers_-February-2024.pdf)\n15. [Single-use versus reusable endoscopes in gastroenterology: Systematic review of full and partial economic evaluations](https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/192270/1/a-2645-1463.pdf)\n16. [The evolution of single-use duodenoscope utilization at a large-volume ERCP tertiary care center](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12850729/)\n17. [Efficacy of cap-assisted endoscopy for the visualization of the major duodenal papilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis](https://www.em-consulte.com/article/1630252/efficacy-of-cap-assisted-endoscopy-for-the-visuali)\n18. [An Overview of the Evolution of Direct Cholangioscopy Techniques for Diagnosis and Therapy](https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/archives/july-2016/an-overview-of-the-evolution-of-direct-cholangioscopy-techniques-for-diagnosis-and-therapy/)\n19. [European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy](https://www.ovid.com/journals/uegj/fulltext/10.1002/ueg2.70123~european-consensus-recommendations-for-direct-cholangioscopy)\n20. [Single Use (Disposable) Duodenoscope: Recent Development and Future (Clinical Endoscopy)](https://www.e-ce.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5946%2Fce.2021.075)\n21. [Single-use duodenoscopes: where are we and where are we going?](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373446/)\n22. [Risk evaluation of duodenoscope-associated infections in the Netherlands](https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1467-6294.pdf)\n23. [Unveiling 8 years of duodenoscope contamination: insights from a retrospective analysis in a large tertiary care hospital (Gut)](https://gut.bmj.com/content/73/4/613)\n24. [Gastroduodenal lesions detected during small bowel capsule endoscopy: incidence, diagnostic and therapeutic impact](https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/diges/v110n2/1130-0108-diges-110-02-00102.pdf)\n25. [Forward-viewing endoscopy with cap-fitting versus side-viewing duodenoscope for ERCP in Billroth II gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis](https://www.em-consulte.com/article/1831037/forward-viewing-endoscopy-with-cap-fitting-versus-)\n26. [Infections Associated Reprocessed Duodenoscopes, fda.gov](https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/reprocessing-reusable-medical-devices/infections-associated-reprocessed-duodenoscopes)\n\n---\n*Topic: Encyclopedia › Life and health › Human health and medicine › Clinical assessment and procedures › Endoscopy and biopsy procedures › Gastrointestinal endoscopy*\n\n*Initially written Sep 29, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026*\n\n*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*\n\nLicense: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\n",
 "same_as": [],
 "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy",
 "markdown_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy.md",
 "license": {
  "name": "Edgepedia Community License 1.0",
  "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license",
  "summary": "Free with credit, commercial use included. AI training is open to everyone. For other uses, organizations over USD 100M in revenue or 100M monthly users license separately.",
  "spdx": "LicenseRef-Edgepedia-Community-1.0"
 },
 "credit": "\"Duodenoscopy\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.",
 "credit_md": "\"[Duodenoscopy](https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy)\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), [https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy](https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy). [Edgepedia Community License 1.0](https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license).",
 "credit_html": "\"<a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy\">Duodenoscopy</a>\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy\">https://www.edgepedia.org/duodenoscopy</a>. <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\">Edgepedia Community License 1.0</a>.",
 "speakable": "Duodenoscopy is the endoscopic examination of the duodenum using a flexible scope passed through the mouth; the side-viewing duodenoscope visualizes the major papilla and serves as the platform for ERCP."
}
