{
 "id": "epx1dv587g",
 "slug": "thermally-induced-phase-separation",
 "title": "Thermally induced phase separation",
 "updated": "2026-10-15",
 "topic_path": [
  {
   "id": "technology",
   "label": "Technology and the built world",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/technology"
  },
  {
   "id": "technology.engineering",
   "label": "Engineering and manufacturing",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/technology.engineering"
  },
  {
   "id": "technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes",
   "label": "Manufacturing processes and fabrication",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes"
  },
  {
   "id": "technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing",
   "label": "Forming, heat treatment, and finishing",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing"
  },
  {
   "id": "technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing.polymer-and-composite-additive-manufacturing",
   "label": "Polymer and composite additive manufacturing",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/topics/technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing.polymer-and-composite-additive-manufacturing"
  }
 ],
 "geo": [
  {
   "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing",
   "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000: Forming, heat treatment, and finishing",
   "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing",
   "path": [
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo",
     "label": "Non-geographic",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946",
     "label": "Non-geographic · 1946 to 2000",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.technology",
     "label": "Technology and the built world",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.technology"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering",
     "label": "Engineering and manufacturing",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes",
     "label": "Manufacturing processes and fabrication",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes"
    },
    {
     "id": "geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing",
     "label": "Forming, heat treatment, and finishing",
     "api_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/api/v1/geo/geo.nongeo.t1946.technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing"
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "excerpt": "Thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) is a fabrication method that cools a polymer-diluent solution until it separates into two phases, leaving porous membranes and tissue-engineering scaffolds.",
 "snippet": "Thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) is a fabrication method that cools a polymer-diluent solution until it separates into two phases, leaving porous membranes and tissue-engineering scaffolds.",
 "node": "technology.engineering.manufacturing.processes.forming-heat-treatment-and-finishing.polymer-and-composite-additive-manufacturing",
 "markdown": "# Thermally induced phase separation\n\nThermally induced phase separation (TIPS) is a fabrication method that cools a homogeneous polymer–diluent solution until it separates into two phases, leaving a porous polymer structure once the diluent is removed. It is used to make microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes, and tissue-engineering scaffolds, and it is, along with non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS), one of the primary commercial porous membrane manufacturing methods.<sup>[1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10934-024-01597-6)</sup> The method produces polymeric foams with porosity over 95% and pore diameters from roughly 1 to 100 µm.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup>\n\n| Key fact | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Product | Porous, typically symmetric polymer membranes and scaffolds; porosity above 95%, pores ~1–100 µm<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup> |\n| Driving force | Cooling into a miscibility gap of the polymer/diluent system; a latent solvent that does not dissolve the polymer at room temperature<sup>[3](https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_1866-1)</sup> |\n| Two separation paths | Solid–liquid (polymer crystallization) or liquid–liquid (polymer-rich/lean phases); L–L precedes crystallization at 10–40 wt.% polymer, crystallization precedes L–L at 50 wt.%<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> |\n| Main steps | Melt-blend 25–100 °C above the polymer's \\( T_{\\mathrm{m}} \\) or \\( T_{\\mathrm{g}} \\), shape, quench, extract diluent, evaporate extractant<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> |\n| Morphology control | Fast quench favors fine spinodal-derived structures; slow cooling gives cellular, bicontinuous, or spherulitic structures<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> |\n| Typical membrane outcome | Modern TIPS PVDF membranes: bi-continuous cross-section, surface pore size around 0.1 µm<sup>[5](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738821007031)</sup>; hollow fibers up to 128.5 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹ pure water flux<sup>[6](https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/polymers/polymers-10-00719/article_deploy/polymers-10-00719-v2.pdf?version=1530417534)</sup> |\n\n## How it works\n\nTIPS requires a diluent, also called a latent solvent, that dissolves the polymer only at elevated temperature; the thermodynamic basis of the separation is a miscibility gap in the polymer/diluent system.<sup>[3](https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_1866-1)</sup> Cooling makes the homogeneous multicomponent system thermodynamically unstable, and it splits into a polymer-rich phase that becomes the scaffold skeleton or membrane matrix and a polymer-lean phase that becomes the porosity after solvent removal by extraction, evaporation, or sublimation.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup> [Miscibility](https://www.edgepedia.org/miscibility) is quantified by the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter \\( \\chi \\), which is favorable when negative and at a minimum.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup>\n\nTwo separation paths compete: solid–liquid (S–L) TIPS, where the polymer crystallizes out of solution, and liquid–liquid (L–L) TIPS, where a polymer-rich continuous phase coexists with polymer-lean droplets.<sup>[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386198000408)</sup> Above the monotectic point, typically at polymer fractions above 30%, S–L separation occurs; at lower fractions L–L separation precedes crystallization, while at 50 wt.% crystallization comes first and isolated spherical pores in spherulites form.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> A strong polymer–diluent interaction brings about S–L separation and spherulites; a weak interaction leads to L–L separation and cellular or network structures.<sup>[6](https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/polymers/polymers-10-00719/article_deploy/polymers-10-00719-v2.pdf?version=1530417534)</sup>\n\nThe phase diagram's binodal and spinodal curves set the route. Cloud points are measured by a cooling method traced back to Powers (1942): a sealed sample is heated until clear, then cooled at a constant rate until demixing turbidity appears. Quenching below the cloud point distinguishes the regions: an immediately interconnected structure indicates the unstable region beneath the spinodal, gradually forming isolated droplets the metastable region between binodal and spinodal.<sup>[8](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainability/articles/10.3389/frsus.2023.1093911/full)</sup> In mechanism terms, nucleation-and-growth (NG) in the metastable region gives relatively large pores, whereas spinodal decomposition (SD) in the unstable region gives a fine, well-interconnected microcellular structure; higher cooling rates suppress NG and favor SD structures.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup>\n\nCooling rate is the main morphology lever. Rapid cooling provides many nuclei and leaves little time for crystal growth; slow cooling gives longer growth times, and membranes formed via L–L separation show porous, cellular-like, or bicontinuous structures, while membranes formed via S–L separation show fuzzy spherulitic structures.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> Droplet growth rates increase with decreasing quench temperature and polymer concentration; high cooling rates and viscous solvents decrease membrane pore sizes, and cooling-rate variation across the membrane thickness creates pore-size gradients and asymmetric structures.<sup>[8](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainability/articles/10.3389/frsus.2023.1093911/full)</sup> Increasing polymer concentration decreases porosity, pure water permeability, and mean pore radius.<sup>[9](https://www.deswater.com/readfulltextopenaccess.php?id=RFdUX2FydGljbGVzL1REV1RfSV8xN18wMS0wM190ZmphL1REV1RfQV8xMDUxMzU3Mi9URFdUX0FfMTA1MTM1NzJfTy5wZGY%3D)</sup>\n\n## How it is done\n\nThe practitioner first homogenizes the polymer–solvent mixture at elevated temperature: the initial temperature is typically 25–100 °C above the melting temperature (\\( T_{\\mathrm{m}} \\)) or glass transition temperature (\\( T_{\\mathrm{g}} \\)) of the neat polymer and below the diluent's boiling point.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> The mixture is shaped as a flat sheet, tube, or hollow fiber, then a temperature quench well below the freezing point of the mixture induces phase separation, and the frozen solvent is removed.<sup>[1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10934-024-01597-6)</sup> In the standard membrane procedure the diluent is removed by solvent extraction and the extractant is then removed, typically by evaporation.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup>\n\nThe solvent-removal step shapes the final structure. For polystyrene foams, average pore sizes were approximately two times larger after lyophilization than after extraction; lyophilized samples had porosity above 82%, while extraction decreased porosity by up to 10% for 14 wt.% PS samples held at 6 °C, because the foam contracts.<sup>[1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10934-024-01597-6)</sup>\n\n## Origin\n\nA 2024 review reports that TIPS experiments dissolved polystyrene in cyclohexane or benzene and obtained micro-structured foams after rapid cooling followed by freeze-drying; PS–cyclohexane gave liquid–liquid separation, while PS–benzene gave solid–liquid demixing with sheet-like morphology because the solvent froze first.<sup>[1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10934-024-01597-6)</sup> Gerard T. Caneba and David S. Soong published an experimental study of membrane structure formation through the thermal-inversion process in Macromolecules in 1985.<sup>[10](https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00154a031)</sup>\n\nThe patent cited throughout the field as the method's starting point is US Patent 4,247,498, \"Methods for making microporous products\", which describes heating a polymer and a compatible liquid to a homogeneous solution, shaping it, cooling at a rate and to a temperature sufficient to initiate non-equilibrium liquid–liquid phase separation, and removing the liquid.<sup>[11](https://patents.google.com/patent/US4247498)</sup> Reviews identify this patent as the foundational TIPS reference,<sup>[12](https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-016-1561-7)</sup> though the literature disagrees on the date: one source gives 1980, most give 1981, and one review states the method was developed in 1978; the discrepancy is unresolved.\n\nThe foundational academic series is Douglas R. Lloyd, Kevin E. Kinzer and H.S. Tseng's 1990 Journal of Membrane Science paper on solid–liquid phase separation<sup>[13](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388%2800%2985130-3)</sup> and the 1991 follow-up on liquid–liquid phase separation by Douglas R. Lloyd, Sung Soo Kim, and Kevin E. Kinzer,<sup>[14](https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388%2891%2980073-f)</sup> followed by a 1993 study by Kenneth S. McGuire, Douglas R. Lloyd and Gordon B.A. Lim on the effects of dilution, cooling rate, and nucleating agent addition on morphology.<sup>[15](https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388%2893%2985015-o)</sup> A related precursor phenomenon, phase separation of polymer solutions on heating in lower critical solution temperature (LCST) systems, was reported by P.I. Freeman and J.S. Rowlinson in Polymer in 1960<sup>[16](https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861%2860%2990004-5)</sup> and underpins a heat-induced variant (below). Yoon Sung Nam and [Tae Gwan Park](https://www.edgepedia.org/tae-gwan-park) applied the method to porous biodegradable scaffolds in the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research in 1999,<sup>[17](https://doi.org/10.1002/%28sici%291097-4636%28199910%2947:1<8::aid-jbm2>3.0.co;2-l)</sup> and PVDF membrane work followed in 2006 (Minghao Gu and colleagues, [Desalination](https://www.edgepedia.org/desalination))<sup>[18](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.015)</sup> and 2008 (Ji and colleagues, hollow fibers with diluent mixtures, Journal of Membrane Science).<sup>[19](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.043)</sup>\n\n## Variants\n\nThe Castro patent distinguishes routes: its cellular microporous structure requires nucleation initiated by spinodal rather than binodal decomposition, achieved by cooling without mixing or shear.<sup>[11](https://patents.google.com/patent/US4247498)</sup> A named combined variant, N-TIPS, was reported by Hideto Matsuyama and colleagues in Polymer in 2002 as porous membrane preparation by combined use of thermally induced phase separation and immersion precipitation.<sup>[20](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861%2802%2900409-3)</sup> A heat-induced variant uses polymer solutions with a lower critical solution temperature, where separation occurs on heating; the resulting structures have pores typically in the range of 0.05 to 10 µm, and polyethersulfone membranes made by this LCST process can exceed 10,000 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹·bar⁻¹ in water permeability.<sup>[21](https://patents.google.com/patent/US5444097)</sup>\n\nAnisotropic TIPS membranes were made from isotactic polypropylene in diphenyl ether by evaporating diluent from one side above the binodal to create a concentration gradient before quenching, giving smaller pores at the top surface and significantly improved permeability over isotropic membranes of similar retention.<sup>[7](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386198000408)</sup> A triple-orifice spinneret that extrudes solvents at the outer layer changes the separation mechanism and produces a composite-like sub-layer that drastically enhances permeation stability.<sup>[22](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ta/c8ta07603k)</sup> Common polymer systems include polypropylene, polyethylene, and PVDF with a range of diluents tabulated in the review literature,<sup>[12](https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-016-1561-7)</sup> including sulfolane,<sup>[23](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.27494)</sup> non-toxic tributyl citrate,<sup>[24](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096739111502300308)</sup> and [PolarClean](https://www.edgepedia.org/polarclean), an ecofriendly, biodegradable, water-soluble solvent whose water affinity induces a NIPS effect during TIPS.<sup>[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673881630309X)</sup> The governing constraint for scaffolds is solubility in a processable solvent: PCL, PLA, and PLGA qualify, while PEEK, PA12, GelMA, and alginate do not.<sup>[26](https://www.techscience.com/jpm/v43n3/68907/html)</sup> Konstantin Pochivalov and colleagues published a 2024 Journal of Membrane Science study of polypropylene membranes via N-TIPS examining the effect of non-solvent nature.<sup>[27](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122839)</sup>\n\n## Applications\n\nTIPS membranes are typically highly porous and symmetric, suited to microfiltration and [membrane contactor](https://www.edgepedia.org/membrane-contactor) applications, whereas NIPS membranes show dense asymmetric surfaces suited to reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.<sup>[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673881630309X)</sup> Modern TIPS PVDF membranes with bi-continuous cross-sections and surface pores around 0.1 µm combine high permeability with good mechanical properties.<sup>[5](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738821007031)</sup> A PVDF hollow fiber made with a PC/DOTP diluent mixture of [upper critical solution temperature](https://www.edgepedia.org/upper-critical-solution-temperature) 110 °C reached a maximum pure water flux of 128.5 L·m⁻²·h⁻¹ with a markedly reduced skin layer.<sup>[6](https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/polymers/polymers-10-00719/article_deploy/polymers-10-00719-v2.pdf?version=1530417534)</sup> N-TIPS polypropylene flat-sheet membranes have been controlled over permeabilities from 0.3 to 48 m³·m⁻²·h⁻¹·bar⁻¹ and mean through pore sizes from 0.22 to 0.55 µm.<sup>[28](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25740881.2022.2101376)</sup>\n\nIn tissue engineering, TIPS scaffolds from PLA in 1,4-dioxane show pores whose geometry mirrors solvent crystallites, averaging about 100 µm.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup> Lombardo and colleagues tuned 3D PLLA foam pore sizes from 25 to 150 µm using demixing at 20–30 °C for 15–30 min and quenching at −20 °C for 10 min.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup> TIPS has also been combined with electrospinning, porogen leaching, and 3D printing.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup> Senthilkumar Ramaswamy, Alan R. Greenberg and William B. Krantz fabricated poly(ECTFE) membranes via TIPS in the Journal of Membrane Science in 2002.<sup>[29](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388%2802%2900383-6)</sup>\n\n## Limitations and alternatives\n\nTIPS uses only two components, polymer and diluent, making membranes inherently more reproducible and less prone to defects than other phase-inversion methods, but the elevated working temperatures mean higher energy consumption.<sup>[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673881630309X)</sup> The method suits semi-crystalline polymers that cannot easily be dissolved, yet tuning surface pores is difficult and the organic diluents are expensive and not environmentally friendly.<sup>[4](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)</sup> Common phthalate diluents DEP, DBP, and DOP raise bioaccumulation and toxicity concerns; DBP has been banned by U.S. federal regulations for use in cosmetics and childcare products, while the common NIPS solvents NMP and DMF face increasing regulatory pressure.<sup>[25](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673881630309X)</sup> Diluent removal is slow and energy-intensive: conventional freeze-drying generally takes three days to one week, and supercritical CO₂ drying is being developed as a faster, lower-cost alternative.<sup>[2](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)</sup>\n\nAgainst NIPS, TIPS trades symmetric high-porosity MF-grade structures for NIPS's dense asymmetric RO/NF surfaces; since the 1980s most available PVDF membranes have been produced via NIPS because PVDF dissolves easily in common organic solvents.<sup>[5](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738821007031)</sup> Modeling remains a gap: predicting porosity and permeability from process conditions is unmet, so membrane research stays largely empirical, and a TIPS model usually considers only heat transfer, whereas NIPS involves mass transfer as well.<sup>[8](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainability/articles/10.3389/frsus.2023.1093911/full)</sup> A 2023 review centered on process sustainability, materials, and modeling,<sup>[30](https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/458984)</sup> and later work includes the 2024 N-TIPS polypropylene study<sup>[27](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122839)</sup> and a 2026 viscoelastic phase-separation analysis of PVDF morphology using \\( Wi = \\tau_{\\mathrm{r}} / \\tau_{\\mathrm{d}} \\), where bicontinuous morphology additionally requires \\( Wi_{i} \\geq 1 \\).<sup>[31](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-50635-7)</sup> The published literature gives no numeric quench rates tied to lacy versus cellular morphology, no typical membrane thicknesses, and no coverage of battery-separator uses.\n\n## References\n\n1. [Influence of the solvent removal method on the morphology of polystyrene porous structures prepared via TIPS (J. Porous Materials, 2024)](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10934-024-01597-6)\n2. [Recent Progress on Biodegradable Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Prepared by Thermally-Induced Phase Separation (TIPS)](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8036748/)\n3. [Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS) for Membrane Preparation (Encyclopedia of Membranes, Figoli 2014)](https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_1866-1)\n4. [A Review on Porous Polymeric Membrane Preparation. Part II (production techniques incl. TIPS)](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723832/)\n5. [A review on microporous polyvinylidene fluoride membranes fabricated via thermally induced phase separation for MF/UF application (Journal of Membrane Science, 2021)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738821007031)\n6. [PVDF hollow fiber membrane via TIPS with a UCST diluent mixture PC/DOTP (Polymers, 2018)](https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/polymers/polymers-10-00719/article_deploy/polymers-10-00719-v2.pdf?version=1530417534)\n7. [Formation of anisotropic membranes via thermally induced phase separation (Matsuyama, Berghmans, Lloyd; Polymer, 1998)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386198000408)\n8. [State-of-the-art review of porous polymer membrane formation characterization (Frontiers in Sustainability, 2023)](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainability/articles/10.3389/frsus.2023.1093911/full)\n9. [PVDF microporous membranes from PVDF/TBC/DEHP ternary system via TIPS (Desalination and Water Treatment)](https://www.deswater.com/readfulltextopenaccess.php?id=RFdUX2FydGljbGVzL1REV1RfSV8xN18wMS0wM190ZmphL1REV1RfQV8xMDUxMzU3Mi9URFdUX0FfMTA1MTM1NzJfTy5wZGY%3D)\n10. [Gerard T. Caneba, David S. Soong (1985). Polymer membrane formation through the thermal-inversion process. 1. Experimental study of membrane structure formation. Macromolecules.](https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00154a031)\n11. [Methods for making microporous products (US Patent 4247498)](https://patents.google.com/patent/US4247498)\n12. [Formation of microporous polymeric membranes via thermally induced phase separation: A review](https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-016-1561-7)\n13. [Microporous membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. I. Solid-liquid phase separation (Journal of Membrane Science, 1990)](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388%2800%2985130-3)\n14. [Microporous membrane formation via thermally-induced phase separation. II. Liquid—liquid phase separation (Journal of Membrane Science, 1991)](https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388%2891%2980073-f)\n15. [Microporous membrane formation via thermally-induced phase separation. VII. Effect of dilution, cooling rate, and nucleating agent addition on morphology (Journal of Membrane Science, 1993)](https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388%2893%2985015-o)\n16. [Lower critical points in polymer solutions (Polymer, 1960)](https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861%2860%2990004-5)\n17. [Porous biodegradable polymeric scaffolds prepared by thermally induced phase separation (Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1999)](https://doi.org/10.1002/%28sici%291097-4636%28199910%2947:1<8::aid-jbm2>3.0.co;2-l)\n18. [Minghao Gu and colleagues (2006). Formation of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes via thermally induced phase separation. Desalination.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.015)\n19. [G JI and colleagues (2008). Structure formation and characterization of PVDF hollow fiber membrane prepared via TIPS with diluent mixture. Journal of Membrane Science.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.043)\n20. [Preparation of porous membrane by combined use of thermally induced phase separation and immersion precipitation (Polymer, 2002)](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861%2802%2900409-3)\n21. [Porous polymeric structures ... by means of heat-induced phase separation (US Patent 5444097)](https://patents.google.com/patent/US5444097)\n22. [Tailoring both the surface pore size and sub-layer structures of PVDF membranes prepared by the TIPS process with a triple orifice spinneret (J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018)](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/ta/c8ta07603k)\n23. [Preparation of porous PVdF membrane via thermally induced phase separation using sulfolane (J. Applied Polymer Science, 2008)](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.27494)\n24. [Tributyl citrate as diluent for preparation of PVDF porous membrane via TIPS (Polymers and Polymer Composites, 2015)](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096739111502300308)\n25. [Understanding the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) effect during the fabrication of microporous PVDF membranes via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) (J. Membrane Science)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673881630309X)\n26. [3D-Printed Porous Polymers: From Pore-Forming Strategies to Emerging Applications (JPM, 2025)](https://www.techscience.com/jpm/v43n3/68907/html)\n27. [Konstantin Pochivalov and colleagues (2024). Polypropylene membranes prepared via non-solvent/thermally induced phase separation: Effect of non-solvent nature. Journal of Membrane Science.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122839)\n28. [Preparation of thermostable polypropylene membranes with a controlled structure by nonsolvent thermally induced phase separation (Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials, 2022)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25740881.2022.2101376)\n29. [Fabrication of poly (ECTFE) membranes via thermally induced phase separation (Journal of Membrane Science, 2002)](https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388%2802%2900383-6)\n30. [Membrane formation by thermally induced phase separation: Materials, involved parameters, modeling, current efforts and future directions (Ma et al., 2023, J. Membrane Science; CNR-ITM record)](https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/458984)\n31. [Formation of PVDF membranes with distinct pore morphologies interpreted through the framework of viscoelastic phase separation (Scientific Reports, 2026)](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-50635-7)\n\n---\n*Topic: Encyclopedia › Technology and the built world › Engineering and manufacturing › Manufacturing processes and fabrication › Forming, heat treatment, and finishing › Polymer and composite additive manufacturing*\n\n*Initially written Sep 29, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026*\n\n*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*\n\nLicense: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\n",
 "same_as": [],
 "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation",
 "markdown_url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation.md",
 "license": {
  "name": "Edgepedia Community License 1.0",
  "url": "https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license",
  "summary": "Free with credit, commercial use included. AI training is open to everyone. For other uses, organizations over USD 100M in revenue or 100M monthly users license separately.",
  "spdx": "LicenseRef-Edgepedia-Community-1.0"
 },
 "credit": "\"Thermally induced phase separation\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation. Edgepedia Community License 1.0.",
 "credit_md": "\"[Thermally induced phase separation](https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation)\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), [https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation](https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation). [Edgepedia Community License 1.0](https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license).",
 "credit_html": "\"<a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation\">Thermally induced phase separation</a>\", Edgepedia (EdgeChat), <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation\">https://www.edgepedia.org/thermally-induced-phase-separation</a>. <a href=\"https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license\">Edgepedia Community License 1.0</a>.",
 "speakable": "Thermally induced phase separation is a fabrication method that cools a polymer-diluent solution until it separates into two phases, leaving porous membranes and tissue-engineering scaffolds."
}