General · EdgepediaOctober 3, 20266 min read

Boudu Saved from Drowning

Boudu Saved from Drowning (French: Boudu sauvé des eaux) is a 1932 French comedy directed by Jean Renoir, adapted from René Fauchois's play of the same name, in which a Parisian tramp who attempts suicide in the Seine is rescued by a bourgeois bookseller and proceeds to overturn his household¹. Michel Simon, who also produced the film, plays Boudu; Charles Granval plays the bookseller Édouard Lestingois¹. The film is widely described as a satire of the bourgeoisie and is considered one of Renoir's key early sound films, preceding Grand Illusion (1937) and The Rules of the Game (1939)¹^•².

Key fact	Detail
Original title	Boudu sauvé des eaux; international title Boudu Saved from Drowning³
Director and source	Jean Renoir; screenplay by Renoir and Albert Valentin after the play by René Fauchois¹
Country and year	France, 1932; black and white¹
Running time	Reported variously as 83 to 87 minutes by different archives⁴^•⁵
French release	11 November 1932 per Cineuropa and AlloCiné; Pathé's own catalog lists 10 April 1932³^•⁶
Production	Société des Films Sirius and Productions Michel Simon; original distributor Établissements Jacques Haïk⁴
Notable remake	Down and Out in Beverly Hills (1986), directed by Paul Mazursky, with Nick Nolte in the Boudu role⁷

Spoilers

Plot

Boudu, a Parisian tramp, is destitute after losing his dog and, disgusted with society, throws himself into the Seine from the Pont des Arts³. Lestingois, a liberal-minded bookseller who watches passersby through a telescope from his apartment, sees him and jumps in to save him³^•⁸. He takes Boudu home, and the family decides to reform him into a respectable bourgeois¹.

Boudu instead spreads disorder through the house. He shocks the household with his manners, spits into a Balzac volume, seduces Madame Lestingois, and pursues Anne-Marie, the maid who is also the bookseller's mistress³^•⁹. To satisfy propriety, the family decides to marry Boudu to the maid; the wedding is held beside the Marne, the bridal boat capsizes, and Boudu swims away and drifts off downstream, returning to his wandering life³. A lottery win of 100,000 francs marks a turning point in the story⁹.

Interpretation

Renoir described the film as a "free exercise around an actor", built around Simon's idiosyncratic performance and around the film's praise of loitering as the opposite of efficiency¹⁷. He defended vagabondage as "the basis of all great civilization", pointing to the Greeks loitering on the Agora¹². Commentators read the film as an attack on the assumption that the poor should be grateful for the charity of the rich, and on a bourgeois liberalism that finds its limits as soon as the tramp acts on his instincts⁷^•¹⁸. The film's narrative geography, moving between the confined bookshop and the open Parisian and riverside exteriors Renoir invented for the screen version, is treated by the Renoir scholar Christopher Faulkner as central to its meaning¹⁷.

The film has been remade and revisited repeatedly, most prominently in Mazursky's Down and Out in Beverly Hills (1986), and its anarchic central figure is cited as an influence on later filmmakers, particularly American directors of the late 1960s and 1970s⁷^•¹⁶.

Production

The film was shot in the summer of 1932 at the Éclair studios in Épinay, with exteriors in Paris, along the Seine quays, in the Bois de Boulogne, and at Chennevières-sur-Marne¹⁰^•¹¹. Marcel Lucien and Georges Asselin photographed it; the editors were Marguerite Renoir and Suzanne de Troye; the assistant directors were Jacques Becker and Georges Darnoux¹. The music draws on Johann Strauss's The Blue Danube, and the song "Sur les bords de la Riviera" is by Léo Daniderff¹⁰.

Simon proposed the adaptation himself. After the hostile reception of Renoir's La Chienne (1931), in which he had played an amoral character attacked by critics and the far-right press, he suggested filming Fauchois's play, which he had already performed on stage in 1925¹². It was the fourth and last Renoir–Simon collaboration, and the only film Simon ever produced¹³.

Street photography. Renoir shot many scenes of Simon walking the Paris quays and streets in character using a long telephoto lens of the kind used to film lions in Africa, mounted at a first-floor window so the camera passed over the roofs of cars; passersby did not notice the actor¹². This documentary-style treatment of real Parisian locations is often cited as anticipating the New Wave nearly three decades later¹⁴. The film is also noted for its early use of deep-focus photography and for Renoir's use of direct sound, which he preferred to the staged effects of contemporary René Clair comedies².

Reception and censorship

The film caused a scandal on release: spectators smashed chairs at the Colisée cinema, where it had its first public screening, and the Prefect of Police of Paris summoned Renoir and Simon to demand cuts to images he considered liable to disturb public order¹². According to restoration notes, the cut passage, in which Boudu spits into the Balzac book and mocks a portrait of a soldier, was preserved in the original negative and restored in the 2K digital restoration carried out by Pathé⁹.

Critical standing rose over time. A 1957 Museum of Modern Art press release states that Renoir considered Boudu his finest work, and notes that the film, initially dismissed as a potboiler unworthy of him, was enthusiastically re-evaluated in postwar revivals¹⁵. Later critics have placed it among Renoir's major comedies; the TCM essay by James Steffen, a film scholar, calls it Renoir's greatest comedy after The Rules of the Game, crediting Simon's performance and Renoir's handling of the contrast between the tramp and the household². On Rotten Tomatoes the film holds a 100% critics' score from 25 reviews¹⁶.

References

Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Screen and stage › Film and television › Films and standalone screen works › Individual films by title and year › Comedy and romantic films (individual works) › Comedies of the 1940s

Initially written Oct 3, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026; Oct 25, 2026; Nov 1, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026

Notice something wrong?