# Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story
**Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story** is a two-part Netflix documentary series, directed by Rowan Deacon and released on 6 April 2022, that examines how the British television presenter [Jimmy Savile](https://www.edgepedia.org/jimmy-savile) concealed decades of sexual abuse behind his public image as a charity fundraiser and national treasure.[1](https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse) • [2](https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/film-and-tv/jimmy-savile-documentary-netflix-release-date-trailer-how-to-watch-netflixs-new-jimmy-savile-netflix-documentary-3624272) Savile, who died on 29 October 2011, had raised millions for charity, been knighted by the Queen in 1990, and received a funeral broadcast live on the BBC; after his death, independent investigations and [Scotland Yard](https://www.edgepedia.org/scotland-yard) inquiries established that he had been a prolific and predatory sex offender, with more than 450 allegations of sexual assault and abuse made against him and victims as young as 5.[3](https://media.netflix.com/en/only-on-netflix/81520549)
| Key fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Format | Two-part Netflix documentary series; episodes "Part 1: Making a Monster" and "Part 2: Finding the Monster"[4](https://www.justwatch.com/us/tv-show/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story) |
| Release | 6 April 2022 on Netflix, streaming from 8:01 am that morning[2](https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/film-and-tv/jimmy-savile-documentary-netflix-release-date-trailer-how-to-watch-netflixs-new-jimmy-savile-netflix-documentary-3624272) |
| Director | Rowan Deacon, whose earlier work includes *The Case of Sally Challen* and *The Tube*[5](https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/jimmy-savile-netflix-british-horror-story-review-b2052671.html) |
| Subject | Jimmy Savile (1926–2011), BBC presenter and charity fundraiser exposed after death as a serial sexual predator; more than 450 allegations, victims as young as 5[3](https://media.netflix.com/en/only-on-netflix/81520549) |
| Critical scores | Metascore 74 (generally favorable); 86% on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer from 14 reviews[6](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story/critic-reviews/) • [7](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/jimmy_savile_a_british_horror_story/s01) |
| Main criticism | Scholars Eugene McLaughlin and Chris Greer argue the series under-examines the role of British institutions in producing Savile's "untouchable" status[1](https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse) |
## Spoilers
### Content and approach
The series runs to a total of nearly three hours and moves chronologically through Savile's career, from his early days as a disc jockey through his tenure as presenter of *Top of the Pops* and *[Jim'll Fix It](https://www.edgepedia.org/jimll-fix-it)*, and on to his post-retirement status as a national treasure in constant demand for television appearances, all supported by his fundraising for [Stoke Mandeville](https://www.edgepedia.org/stoke-mandeville) hospital and other institutions.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail) Its method combines contemporary footage, present-day interviews with people who worked with or knew Savile, the investigative journalists who eventually unearthed the evidence behind years of rumors, and one of his victims.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail)
**Archival material and testimony.** The documentary relies heavily on archive clips of Savile himself, recontextualizing footage originally made as light entertainment. One of its most effective sequences is testimony from Sam Brown, whom Savile repeatedly abused at Stoke Mandeville hospital; the reviewer Lucy Mangan in *The Guardian* described the film as giving Brown "space, dignity and the last word" while embedding her detail without sensationalism.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail) The broadcaster [Selina Scott](https://www.edgepedia.org/selina-scott) also appears, watching footage of her own 1980s interview with Savile and noting her discomfort at the time.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail)
The film covers Savile's entree into the establishment through his charity work, including his friendships with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who admired his can-do spirit, and Prince Charles, who corresponded with him for years seeking advice on public relations.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail) It also addresses the suppressed journalism: the investigative journalist Meirion Jones found victims willing to testify, but his BBC *Newsnight* investigation into the by-then late Savile's rapes and abuse was pulled at the last minute, apparently to save the BBC embarrassment.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail) The documentary acknowledges circumstances surrounding the crimes and cover-up, including Savile's consorting with influential politicians and police officers, his aggressive litigiousness, and the extent to which his victims were dismissed as part of a wider "groupie culture" in the 1960s and 1970s music industry.[5](https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/jimmy-savile-netflix-british-horror-story-review-b2052671.html)
**Omissions and devices.** The series passes relatively lightly over possible causes of Savile's behavior and omits claims about necrophilia, which *The Guardian* attributed possibly to legal reasons, to palatability for international audiences, or to viewer credulity.[8](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail) Louis Chilton in *The Independent* noted that a 2009 police interview in which Savile was questioned about his crimes is recreated using voice actors, and criticized the film's use of what he called the gaudier aesthetic tropes of modern true crime documentaries, including superfluous talking-head interviews and sinister underscore.[5](https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/jimmy-savile-netflix-british-horror-story-review-b2052671.html)
## Critical reception
The series received generally favorable reviews from critics. On Metacritic it scored 74 based on five reviews, with three positive and two mixed and none negative; *The Guardian*, *The Telegraph*, and *The Times* each scored it 80, while *Decider* and *The Independent* scored it 60.[6](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story/critic-reviews/) On Rotten Tomatoes it holds an 86% Tomatometer from 14 reviews and a 56% audience score.[7](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/jimmy_savile_a_british_horror_story/s01) Ed Power in *The Telegraph* described it as "horrifically thorough" as an overview of the license Savile was given to prey on vulnerable young people, and noted it was clearly intended for an international audience and for UK viewers too young to remember Savile on the airwaves.[6](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story/critic-reviews/) Chilton's mixed review concluded that the subject was at times too monstrous to be spun into Netflix entertainment, arguing that the friends, co-workers, and media figures who enabled his behavior were never truly interrogated.[5](https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/jimmy-savile-netflix-british-horror-story-review-b2052671.html)
## Scholarly criticism
Criminologist Eugene McLaughlin of City, University of London and sociologist Chris Greer of the [University of Essex](https://www.edgepedia.org/university-of-essex), who research the Savile case, published a critique of the documentary in May 2022. They wrote that the series presents Savile as a fame-hungry manipulator who, through carefully cultivated relationships with British elites, abused and intimidated his victims, evaded justice, and fooled the nation, but that despite high production values and impressive use of archival material it leaves key parts of the scandal under-examined.[1](https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse) In their view, Savile was not alone in constructing his image: the BBC, the NHS, the Department of Education and Science, the state, the church, the monarchy, the military, and the public were all involved in his collective validation, and by marginalizing the empowering role of institutions the documentary, like the official inquiries, ultimately preserves those institutions' reputations.[1](https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse)
The documentary appeared in a wider field of Savile screen works. It followed Discovery's *Jimmy Savile: The People Who Knew* (2021) and preceded the BBC's four-part drama *The Reckoning* (2023), in which [Steve Coogan](https://www.edgepedia.org/steve-coogan) played Savile.[9](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2021/aug/07/jimmy-savile-the-people-who-knew-review-discovery) • [10](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-reckoning-review-steve-coogan-jimmy-savile-b2426367.html) The underlying case it documents is established by official findings: the Dame Janet Smith review concluded that at least 72 people were sexually abused by Savile in connection with his work at the BBC, including eight rape victims, with offending from 1959 to 2006, mostly in the 1970s, and the largest number of victims connected with *Top of the Pops*.[11](https://bbcinsight.pages.dev/news/uk-35657868) A joint [Metropolitan Police](https://www.edgepedia.org/metropolitan-police) and NSPCC report published in January 2013 recorded 214 criminal offenses, including 34 rapes, against Savile's name across the UK between 1955 and 2009.[12](https://bbcinsight.pages.dev/news/uk-19946626)
## References
1. [Jimmy Savile: how the Netflix documentary fails to address the role institutions play in abuse, City St George's, University of London (McLaughlin and Greer), 12 May 2022](https://www.citystgeorges.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse)
2. [Jimmy Savile documentary: Netflix release date, trailer, how to watch, The Scotsman](https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/film-and-tv/jimmy-savile-documentary-netflix-release-date-trailer-how-to-watch-netflixs-new-jimmy-savile-netflix-documentary-3624272)
3. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story, Netflix Media Center](https://media.netflix.com/en/only-on-netflix/81520549)
4. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story – streaming, JustWatch](https://www.justwatch.com/us/tv-show/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story)
5. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story review – A true crime story too monstrous for the format, The Independent, 7 April 2022](https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/jimmy-savile-netflix-british-horror-story-review-b2052671.html)
6. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story critic reviews, Metacritic](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story/critic-reviews/)
7. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story: Limited Series, Rotten Tomatoes](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/jimmy_savile_a_british_horror_story/s01)
8. [Jimmy Savile: A British Horror Story review – a welter of devastating detail, The Guardian, 6 April 2022](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/apr/06/jimmy-savile-a-british-horror-story-review-a-welter-of-devastating-detail)
9. [Jimmy Savile: The People Who Knew review – devastating and damning, The Guardian, 7 August 2021](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2021/aug/07/jimmy-savile-the-people-who-knew-review-discovery)
10. [The Reckoning review: Steve Coogan's Jimmy Savile drama, The Independent, 9 October 2023](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-reckoning-review-steve-coogan-jimmy-savile-b2426367.html)
11. [Jimmy Savile and the BBC: Dame Janet Smith report's key sections, BBC News, 25 February 2016](https://bbcinsight.pages.dev/news/uk-35657868)
12. [Jimmy Savile abuse: Key questions on the NHS scandal, BBC News, 26 February 2015](https://bbcinsight.pages.dev/news/uk-19946626)
---
*Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Screen and stage › Film and television › Series and fictional screen worlds › Unscripted, reality, and web-native series › Documentary, docudrama, and lifestyle series › True crime and investigative docuseries › Premiered 2006 to 2022*
*Initially written Oct 3, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026; Oct 25, 2026; Nov 1, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026*
*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*
License: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license