General · EdgepediaOctober 3, 20266 min read

Murder!

Murder! is a 1930 British mystery-thriller directed by Alfred Hitchcock for British International Pictures, in which a stage actor serving on a jury works to prove the innocence of a young actress convicted of murder. It was one of Hitchcock's first sound films, adapted from the 1928 detective novel Enter Sir John by Clemence Dane and Helen Simpson, and it was shot twice, in English and in a German-language version released in 1931 as Mary.¹^•²

Key fact	Detail
Director / studio	Alfred Hitchcock, for British International Pictures; producer John Maxwell¹
Source	The novel Enter Sir John (1928) by Helen Simpson and Clemence Dane, the pseudonym of Winifred Ashton³
Screenplay	Alfred Hitchcock, Walter C. Mycroft, and Alma Reville²
Principal cast	Herbert Marshall (Sir John Menier, his talkie debut), Norah Baring (Diana Baring), Esme Percy (Handel Fane)¹^•²
Dual-language production	Shot concurrently with a German version, Mary (1931), starring Alfred Abel and Olga Tschechowa⁴
Release / runtime	UK theatrical release 24 November 1930; running time about 92 minutes¹
Critical standing	83% on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer from 18 reviews¹

Spoilers

Plot

Actress Edna Druce is found dead, and fellow troupe member Diana Baring cannot explain why she is holding the murder weapon. Diana is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death, but one juror, the distinguished West End actor-manager Sir John Menier, remains unconvinced of her guilt. He sets out to find the real murderer before the sentence is carried out, collecting clues and revisiting the crime scene, at one point staging the case as a play in order to re-enact the crime.¹^•²

The murderer Sir John uncovers is Handel Fane, Diana's fellow actor and would-be lover, who killed Edna ostensibly to prevent her from revealing that he is "half-caste", that he has "black blood". In the last act, Fane goes back to his old circus work, doing an aerial routine while costumed as a woman, and takes his own life, admitting his guilt in a suicide note sent to Sir John. Released from prison, Diana joins Sir John as co-star in his latest production and, it is implied, becomes his future wife.⁵

Source and screenplay

The film is often recalled as having been adapted from a play, but the source material was a novel about the theater, Enter Sir John, the first of three detective novels written by Helen Simpson and Winifred Ashton under the pseudonym Clemence Dane, published in 1928.²^•³ Some reference sources, including Kino Lorber's release notes, still describe it as a play by the two authors.⁴ Simpson, an Australian actress-turned-playwright, later contributed dialogue to Hitchcock's Sabotage (1936) and wrote the novel Under Capricorn, which Hitchcock filmed in 1949.²

Hitchcock adapted the novel with Walter C. Mycroft, while his wife Alma Reville worked on the scenario.³ Hitchcock later called it one of his rare whodunits and said he generally avoided the genre because all the interest is concentrated in the ending: "No emotion. You simply wait to find out who committed the murder."²

Production and sound experiments

Filming began on both language versions in March 1930 and wrapped during May; Hitchcock said it took eleven weeks in the studio at Elstree to produce the film in two versions.³^•⁶ Production started before the dialogue had been fully completed, and Hitchcock encouraged the cast to improvise their lines in unfinished scenes. He judged the experiment a failure: "The result wasn't good; there was too much faltering... The timing was wrong and it had no rhythm."³

Sound innovation. Because post-production dubbing technology did not yet exist in 1930, Hitchcock had to produce overlapping sounds live during the shot. The film contains a 3-minute uninterrupted take, overlapping dialogue, and what some consider the first use of a voice-over to denote an internal monologue: in Herbert Marshall's shaving scene, his stream-of-consciousness narration plays over ambient shaving sounds because Hitchcock pre-recorded it and played it back on a tape recorder on set. For the radio music Sir John listens to in the same scene, Hitchcock hid a 30-piece orchestra behind the bathroom wall and had it play live while the cameras rolled.²^•⁷

The German version, Mary

British International Pictures had for several years partnered with European studios on bilingual productions, shooting a foreign-language version with a different cast at the same time as the English one. Studio head John Maxwell selected Enter Sir John for such a production, and Hitchcock traveled to the Süd-Film studio in Berlin to discuss it; the German version was released in 1931 as Mary, written by Georg C. Klaren and Herbert Juttke, with Alfred Abel as Sir John and Olga Tschechowa as Mary Baring.³^•⁴

Mary was not simply a translation. According to Olivia Landry's comparative study, the German version was abridged and the murder motive was significantly altered, from concealing a racialized identity to concealing a criminal past. Hitchcock discussed the experiment only briefly and with regret, telling Truffaut and others, "About my German production I will say nothing."⁶

Themes and reception

The film plays on the boundary between reality and performance. The cast members come from the stage or the circus, a murder gets restaged as a performance embedded within another performance, and the surname of the accused, Baring, belongs also to the actress portraying her. Hitchcock visually blurs what is real and what is staged throughout, most strongly in the final shot.²

Fane's secret. Much critical attention has focused on Handel Fane. Eric Rohmer and Claude Chabrol, in their 1957 study of Hitchcock, argued that Fane's cross-dressing and "feminine tics" indicate that his real secret is not that he is "half-caste" but that he is "a sexual half-breed, a homosexual", a reading Truffaut put to Hitchcock in their 1962 interview. The BFI notes that in 1930 this was about as close as a mainstream British film could come to representing homosexuality on screen.⁵^•⁷

The film was well reviewed but, Hitchcock believed, played mainly in cities: "It was quite successful in London, but it was too sophisticated for the provinces."² A contemporary review in The New Age praised the acting, calling Herbert Marshall's Sir John "one of the most completely satisfying performances I have seen for a long time", while faulting the film's slow tempo and overused contrapuntal method.⁸ Later critics have been divided: Rotten Tomatoes records an 83% Tomatometer, with Time Out calling it "perhaps the most provocative of all early British Hitchcocks" and Dave Kehr calling it "a crucial insight into the development of one of the cinema's greatest artists", while other reviewers find it heavy and stage-bound.¹

The falsely accused innocent, here a woman defended by a male associate, became a recurring Hitchcock theme, appearing in The 39 Steps (1935), Young and Innocent (1937), and North by Northwest (1959).⁷ Kim Newman also notes that although The Man Who Knew Too Much is often said to be the only film Hitchcock made twice, he in fact remade Murder! as Mary.⁹

References

Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Screen and stage › Film and television › Films and standalone screen works › Individual films by title and year › Crime, thriller, and mystery films (individual works) › 1920s–1940s films

Initially written Oct 3, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026; Oct 25, 2026; Nov 1, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026

Notice something wrong?