# Nuclear spin and parity

Every nucleus with even proton number Z and even neutron number N has ground-state spin I = 0, while a nucleus of odd mass number A has half-integer spin and a nucleus of even A has integer spin.<sup>[1](http://hyperphysics.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/nspin.html)</sup>

| Key fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Even-even ground states | \(J^{\pi} = 0^{+}\) with no known exception among ~800 measured cases<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> |
| Spin from mass number | Odd A gives half-integer spin; even A gives integer spin<sup>[1](http://hyperphysics.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/nspin.html)</sup> |
| Pairing gap scale | Δ ≈ 12/√A MeV<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> |
| Odd-A ground-state rule | Set by the single unpaired nucleon, J^π = j·(−1)^ℓ<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> |
| NUBASE2020 coverage | Recommended \(J^{\pi}\) for 3340 ground states and 1938 isomers; 218 trend-based estimates for unobserved ground states<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> |
| Directly measured spins | 1062 states (827 ground states, 235 isomers)<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> |
| Effective spin g-factor | \(g_{\mathrm{s}}^{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 0.7 \cdot g_{\mathrm{s}}^{\mathrm{free}}\)<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> |

## What spin and parity mean for a nucleus

A nucleus of odd mass number A has a half-integer spin and a nucleus of even A has an integer spin.<sup>[1](http://hyperphysics.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/nspin.html)</sup>

## Even-even nuclei: the 0+ rule

All nuclei with even Z and even N have nuclear spin I = 0 in their ground states; [HyperPhysics](https://www.edgepedia.org/hyperphysics) illustrates this with the iron isotope table, where all even-A nuclides have spin I = 0.<sup>[1](http://hyperphysics.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/nspin.html)</sup> The mechanism is the pairing interaction. Like nucleons occupy the same spatial orbital in time-reversed configurations, and a pair coupled this way carries exactly zero angular momentum. The pairing gap that stabilizes this configuration is approximately Δ ≈ 12/√A MeV, behaving much like the BCS gap in condensed-matter superconductors.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup>

The empirical record is unambiguous. Among the ~800 even-even nuclei with measured ground-state spins, there is no known exception to \(J^{\pi} = 0^{+}\).<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> This makes the 0+ assignment one of the most robust empirical facts in nuclear physics.

## Odd-A nuclei and the Schmidt lines

For an odd-A nucleus, all nucleons except one are paired off, and the ground-state spin and parity are set by that single unpaired nucleon: J^π = j·(−1)^ℓ, where j is its total single-particle angular momentum and ℓ its orbital angular momentum.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> The predicted spin depends on which orbital the odd nucleon occupies, which the shell model fixes between magic numbers.

Measured odd-nucleon magnetic moments cluster between the two Schmidt lines, at roughly 60–70% of the way from the center toward the Schmidt lines, with systematic underprediction for j = ℓ+1/2 states and overprediction for j = ℓ−1/2 states.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> A practical correction replaces the free-nucleon spin g-factor by an effective value, g_s^eff ≈ 0.7 g_s^free, which brings the Schmidt values much closer to experiment; the remaining departures come from configuration mixing, core polarization, and meson-exchange currents.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup>

## Odd-odd nuclei: rules of thumb

An odd-odd nucleus has both an unpaired proton and an unpaired neutron, and their two angular momenta \(j_{\mathrm{p}}\) and \(j_{\mathrm{n}}\) can couple to a range of total \(J\) values. The Nordheim rules summarize the observed tendency. The strong rule predicts the ground-state spin \(J = |j_{\mathrm{p}} - j_{\mathrm{n}}|\), while the weak rule allows either \(J = |j_{\mathrm{p}} - j_{\mathrm{n}}|\) or \(J = j_{\mathrm{p}} + j_{\mathrm{n}}\); the weak rule frequently fails.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup>

Because neither rule is reliable, odd-odd ground states admit no simple prediction of the kind that works for even-even and odd-A nuclei. Each case requires either measurement or a detailed model calculation.

## By the numbers

The NUBASE2020 evaluation contains recommended properties for the ground states of 3340 nuclides and for 1938 excited isomeric states (T₁/₂ > 100 ns), derived from all available experimental data, plus trend-based estimates for 218 unobserved ground states and 45 isomers.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> Directly measured spins were compiled for 1062 states, 827 ground states, and 235 isomers, and these values are flagged in the evaluation with the symbol '*'.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup>

So of the 3340 ground states evaluated, roughly a quarter carry a directly measured spin. NUBASE2020 distinguishes the quality of assignments explicitly: parentheses are used only when "weak" arguments based on experimental observations support the value, while assignments based on theoretical predictions or trend-based (TNN) estimates are given without parentheses and flagged with the symbol '#', a convention that differs from ENSDF practice.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup>

## How J^π is measured

Spin and parity are determined by different kinds of experiments, and a spin measurement alone never fixes the parity.

**Spin.** The workhorse for nuclei far from stability is laser spectroscopy. The "in-source" techniques, RILIS at ISOLDE (CERN) and TRILIS at [ISAC (TRIUMF)](https://www.edgepedia.org/isac-triumf), and "collinear" techniques such as CRIS at ISOLDE were deployed across the NUBASE2020 evaluation.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> These methods measure the hyperfine structure of atomic transitions, which splits into 2I+1 components and thereby reveals the nuclear spin I.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup> For nuclei accessible to nuclear reactions, other routes include (d,p) transfer-reaction angular distributions, gamma-ray angular correlations measured with arrays such as GRETINA and AGATA, and [Coulomb excitation](https://www.edgepedia.org/coulomb-excitation).<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup>

**Parity.** The experimental methods used for spin determination do not provide direct information about the parity of a given state.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> Parity assignments instead rely on additional data such as the orbital angular momentum (l-values) of particles in transfer reactions, hindrance factors in radioactive decay, and measured magnetic moments.<sup>[3](https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae)</sup> Beta-decay systematics also contribute: allowed beta decays (\(\Delta J = 0, 1\) with no parity change) have \(\log ft \approx 3\text{–}6\), while forbidden transitions have progressively larger \(\log ft\) values, so the decay rate helps distinguish candidate \(J^{\pi}\) assignments.<sup>[2](https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/)</sup>

This two-step structure explains why evaluated tables sometimes quote a spin with confidence while the parity carries parentheses: the spin may be directly measured, but the parity rests on weaker, indirect arguments.

## References

1. Nuclear Spin (HyperPhysics) — http://hyperphysics.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/nspin.html
2. Chapter 2 — Nuclear Properties: Size, Shape, Mass, Spin — https://datafield.dev/nuclear-physics/part-01/chapter-02/
3. The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties — https://beta.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae

---
*Topic: Encyclopedia › Physical world and mathematics › Physics › Particles and nuclei › Nuclear physics › Nuclear structure and models › Nuclear properties and isotopes › Nuclear spin and parity*

*Initially written Sep 17, 2026 · Edited: Oct 11, 2026; Oct 15, 2026*

*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*

License: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license