# Pepsi, Where's My Jet?

**Pepsi, Where's My Jet?** is a four-part Netflix documentary miniseries, directed by Andrew Renzi and released on November 17, 2022, that recounts the 1990s legal battle between college student John Leonard and PepsiCo over a television commercial that appeared to offer a Harrier fighter jet for 7,000,000 Pepsi Points.<sup>[1](https://jlpeterman.com/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[2](https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/leonard-v-pepsico)</sup> The underlying case, *Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.*, 88 F. Supp. 2d 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999), is now a staple of United States contracts law teaching.<sup>[3](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[2](https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/leonard-v-pepsico)</sup>

| Key fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Subject | The Leonard v. PepsiCo dispute over a 1995–1996 "Pepsi Stuff" commercial offering a Harrier jet for 7,000,000 Pepsi Points<sup>[2](https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/leonard-v-pepsico)</sup> |
| Release | Netflix, November 17, 2022; four episodes of roughly 36 to 43 minutes each<sup>[1](https://jlpeterman.com/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[4](https://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/2022/11/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-netflix-review/)</sup> |
| Director | Andrew Renzi<sup>[1](https://jlpeterman.com/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/)</sup> |
| Central figures | John Leonard, a 20-year-old student from Seattle, and his investor Todd Hoffman<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> |
| Court outcome | Summary judgment for PepsiCo by Judge Kimba Wood (S.D.N.Y. 1999), affirmed by the Second Circuit in 2000<sup>[3](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[6](https://tortwell.com/cases/210-f3d-88)</sup> |
| Reception | 83% Tomatometer and 75% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes; Metascore 62 on Metacritic<sup>[7](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/pepsi_wheres_my_jet/s01)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[8](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/critic-reviews/)</sup> |

## The Pepsi Stuff campaign

In the mid-1990s, during the "cola wars" with [Coca-Cola](https://www.edgepedia.org/coca-cola), Pepsi ran the "Pepsi Stuff" promotion, in which customers collected Pepsi Points from cans and bottles and redeemed them for branded merchandise: a T-shirt cost 75 points, sunglasses 175 points, and a leather jacket 1,450 points.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[9](https://www.whattowatch.com/features/fact-vs-fiction-is-pepsi-wheres-my-jet-a-true-story)</sup> The campaign's television commercial ended with a teenage character landing a [Harrier jump jet](https://www.edgepedia.org/harrier-jump-jet) in front of a high school and saying "Sure beats the bus!", over on-screen text reading "Harrier fighter" and "7,000,000 Pepsi points."<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> The ad carried no disclaimer stating that the jet was a joke, and the jet was not listed in the official catalog or order form.<sup>[10](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914baf3add7b04934793d8f)</sup>

The Harrier was a British-designed military aircraft used in the United States primarily by the Marine Corps. Sources differ on its value: court-related teaching materials put it at approximately $23 million, while the Guardian and Tom's Guide give $32 million.<sup>[11](https://law.depaul.edu/admission/visit/Documents/Contracts%20Cauble.pdf)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[12](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[13](https://www.tomsguide.com/entertainment/netflix/this-netflix-show-explains-a-viral-super-bowl-2026-ad-heres-why-im-recommending-it-to-my-family-this-weekend)</sup>

## Leonard's attempt to redeem the jet

John Leonard, a 20-year-old student from Seattle, took the commercial seriously and set out to assemble 7 million points.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> Because Pepsi also allowed points to be purchased for 10 cents apiece, the effective price of the jet came to about $700,000.<sup>[12](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane)</sup> Leonard enlisted Todd Hoffman, a multimillionaire businessman he had met on a climbing trip, who helped fund the effort.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup>

Leonard submitted an order form, 15 original Pepsi Points, and a check for $700,008.50 to purchase the remaining points, stating in an accompanying letter that the check was "expressly for obtaining a new Harrier jet as advertised in your Pepsi Stuff commercial."<sup>[10](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914baf3add7b04934793d8f)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[14](https://madisonian.net/downloads/contracts/leonard.pdf)</sup> According to the documentary, Leonard had called the Pentagon to confirm that a civilian could legally own a Harrier stripped of armaments, and had plans to exhibit the aircraft at air shows or rent it for films and advertisements.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> Pepsi refused to deliver the jet.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup>

## The litigation

Pepsi struck first in court. After Leonard's side threatened legal action, Pepsi filed suit in July 1996 seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no obligation to furnish a Harrier Jet; Leonard filed his own suit the following month seeking specific performance.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[10](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914baf3add7b04934793d8f)</sup>

Judge [Kimba Wood](https://www.edgepedia.org/kimba-wood) of the Southern District of New York granted PepsiCo summary judgment in 1999. Applying the objective theory of contract formation, she held that the commercial was not a binding offer because no reasonable person could have concluded that it seriously offered a Harrier jet; the court described the jet's military functions and called its depiction as a way to get to school "clearly not serious."<sup>[3](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[15](https://www.bu.edu/law/files/2018/08/Pepsico-Case-small.pdf)</sup> The court also noted that the alleged sale would invoke the statute of frauds, requiring a signed writing that the commercial and order form did not supply.<sup>[16](https://southernlawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Article-9.pdf)</sup> The Second Circuit affirmed in 2000.<sup>[6](https://tortwell.com/cases/210-f3d-88)</sup>

After Leonard's attempt, Pepsi twice altered the commercial, first raising the jet's price to 700,000,000 Pepsi Points and then adding the caption "(Just Kidding)"; the court found this alteration not probative of the seriousness of the original offer.<sup>[3](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[17](https://southernlawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/SLJ-Vol-32.pdf)</sup>

## The documentary

Renzi's series mixes interviews with Leonard, Hoffman, Pepsi executives, and others with playful 1990s-styled recreations, period pop music, and a running gag in which every interview subject takes the Pepsi Challenge blind taste test.<sup>[4](https://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/2022/11/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-netflix-review/)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[18](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-tv-review-2022)</sup> It emphasizes points generally underreported in retellings, including that Pepsi filed the first lawsuit and that Leonard had genuinely planned what to do with the aircraft.<sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> One episode covers a Pepsi promotion in the Philippines, the "Pepsi 349" incident, which the series uses to explore the dangers of false advertising.<sup>[18](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-tv-review-2022)</sup> The series also covers Leonard's brief engagement of lawyer [Michael Avenatti](https://www.edgepedia.org/michael-avenatti), later imprisoned for defrauding [Stormy Daniels](https://www.edgepedia.org/stormy-daniels) among other felony convictions, and Hoffman's reaction to him.<sup>[12](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane)</sup>

Critics were broadly positive. The Guardian found the story too slight for four episodes but acknowledged the case's place in legal teaching; RogerEbert.com praised the series for connecting the anecdote to the broader question of corporate responsibility in advertising.<sup>[12](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[18](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-tv-review-2022)</sup>

## Legacy

*Leonard v. Pepsico* is taught in United States law schools as a leading example of the objective theory of offers and of the distinction between binding offers and puffery (exaggerated advertising claims not taken as literal fact).<sup>[2](https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/leonard-v-pepsico)</sup><sup> • </sup><sup>[5](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)</sup> The story regained public attention in February 2026, when [Frontier Airlines](https://www.edgepedia.org/frontier-airlines)' Super Bowl LX commercial "The Big Redemption" rewarded Leonard with 7 million air miles, a nod to the 7 million Pepsi Points he never redeemed for a jet.<sup>[13](https://www.tomsguide.com/entertainment/netflix/this-netflix-show-explains-a-viral-super-bowl-2026-ad-heres-why-im-recommending-it-to-my-family-this-weekend)</sup>

## References

1. [Pepsi Where's My Jet? – Jeff Louis Peterman, cinematographer](https://jlpeterman.com/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/)
2. [Pepsi Court Case Explainer – Leonard v. Pepsico, Netflix Tudum](https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/leonard-v-pepsico)
3. [Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 2d 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1999), Justia](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/)
4. [Why Pepsi, Where's My Jet? is irresistible, reality blurred](https://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/2022/11/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-netflix-review/)
5. [Pepsi: They thought no one could drink enough to win a military jet, The Independent](https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-lawsuit-netflix-b2228232.html)
6. [John D.R. Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., 210 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000), Tortwell](https://tortwell.com/cases/210-f3d-88)
7. [Pepsi, Where's My Jet?: Season 1, Rotten Tomatoes](https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/pepsi_wheres_my_jet/s01)
8. [Pepsi, Where's My Jet? critic reviews, Metacritic](https://www.metacritic.com/tv/pepsi-wheres-my-jet/critic-reviews/)
9. [Is Pepsi, Where's My Jet a true story?, What to Watch](https://www.whattowatch.com/features/fact-vs-fiction-is-pepsi-wheres-my-jet-a-true-story)
10. [Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 1999), CaseMine](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914baf3add7b04934793d8f)
11. [Contracts teaching materials, DePaul University College of Law](https://law.depaul.edu/admission/visit/Documents/Contracts%20Cauble.pdf)
12. [Pepsi, Where's My Jet? review, The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/18/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-review-the-oddly-dull-tale-of-a-man-who-sued-a-soft-drink-for-a-weaponised-plane)
13. [This Netflix show explains a viral Super Bowl 2026 ad, Tom's Guide](https://www.tomsguide.com/entertainment/netflix/this-netflix-show-explains-a-viral-super-bowl-2026-ad-heres-why-im-recommending-it-to-my-family-this-weekend)
14. [John D.R. Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., opinion PDF](https://madisonian.net/downloads/contracts/leonard.pdf)
15. [Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., case PDF, Boston University School of Law](https://www.bu.edu/law/files/2018/08/Pepsico-Case-small.pdf)
16. [Statute of frauds analysis, Southern Law Journal Vol. 32](https://southernlawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Article-9.pdf)
17. [Southern Law Journal Vol. 32](https://southernlawjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/SLJ-Vol-32.pdf)
18. [Pepsi, Where's My Jet? movie review, RogerEbert.com](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-tv-review-2022)

---
*Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Food, customs, and everyday culture › Food, cooking and hospitality › Beverages and drink culture › Soft drinks and non-alcoholic beverages › Soft drink brands and companies*

*Initially written Sep 17, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 15, 2026; Oct 25, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026*

*Copyright 2026 EdgeChat AI, a subsidiary of Biostate AI.*

License: Edgepedia Community License 1.0, https://www.edgepedia.org/edgepedia/license
