General · EdgepediaOctober 3, 20267 min read

Raavan (रावण)

Raavan (रावण) is a 2010 Hindi-language action drama directed, written and co-produced by Mani Ratnam, in which a bandit leader kidnaps the wife of the policeman responsible for his sister's death, and the captive woman begins to question where the line between hero and villain falls.¹ It was shot simultaneously with a Tamil version, Raavanan (ராவணன்), starring much of the same cast in exchanged roles, and a Telugu dubbed version titled Villain.² The film is a modern retelling of the Ramayana, the ancient Sanskrit epic, told largely from the side of its traditional villain.³

Key fact	Detail
Director and writers	Mani Ratnam (director, screenwriter, producer), with Vijay Krishna Acharya credited as a writer on the Hindi version⁴
Lead cast	Abhishek Bachchan as Beera Munda, Aishwarya Rai as Ragini, Vikram as SP Dev Pratap Sharma, Govinda as Sanjeevani Kumar⁵
Music	Composed by A.R. Rahman with lyrics by Gulzar; the soundtrack launched on 26 April 2010 at Yash Raj Studios in Mumbai⁶
Release	18 June 2010, on approximately 2200 screens worldwide, the first Indian film released simultaneously in Hindi, Tamil and Telugu versions²
India box office	Net collection of 291.7 million (29.17 crore; Bollywood Hungama) against a reported budget of 550 million (55 crore; Box Office India)⁷^•⁸
Audience ratings	IMDb 5.4/10 for the Hindi version against 7.0/10 for the Tamil Raavanan¹^•⁹
Later verdict	Mani Ratnam said in 2023 that making the film as a bilingual was a mistake, "a case of neither here nor there"¹⁰

Spoilers

Story and the Ramayana framework

The plot follows Dev Pratap Sharma (Vikram), a police officer married to Ragini (Aishwarya Rai), a classical dancer. Beera Munda (Abhishek Bachchan), a tribal outlaw who holds sway over the forest region where Dev is posted, kidnaps Ragini in revenge for the death of his sister Jamuniya at the hands of Dev's men, and the pursuit moves into dense jungle terrain.¹¹ As captivity lengthens, Ragini begins to see her captor's side of the story, and the film asks whether Beera is "raavan (demon) or Robin Hood".³

The mapping onto the Ramayana is deliberate and detailed. Reviewers identified Ragini with Sita, Dev with Rama, Beera with Ravana, and Govinda's forest-guard character Sanjeevani with Hanuman; the fourteen days of Ragini's captivity echo Rama's fourteen years of exile, and the demand that Ragini prove her fidelity reworks Sita's trial by fire as a polygraph test.¹² The scholar Amit Basole, writing in Economic and Political Weekly in July 2010, argued that the film uses this framework to depict the contradiction between the adivasis (India's tribal communities) and the state, recasting Ravana as the wronged subaltern (a marginalized group outside society's power structures; Beera as the oppressed outsider) and Rama as the agent of an oppressive order, in line with a longer tradition of anti-Brahminical reinterpretations of Hindu legend associated with Jyotirao Phule.¹³

Production and the bilingual experiment

Two films, one shoot. Ratnam filmed the Hindi and Tamil versions back to back with the same core crew, changing the male leads between languages. Vikram, a National Film Award-winning Tamil star making his Hindi debut, played the police officer Dev in Hindi and the outlaw Beera (named Veeraiya in Tamil) in the Tamil version; Prithviraj Sukumaran played Dev in Tamil.¹⁴ Aishwarya Rai played Ragini in both versions, and Priyamani, who played Beera's sister, dubbed her own performance in Hindi, Tamil and Telugu.¹⁵ Ratnam said the double production demanded more than double the toil, "more like 2.5", because a scene improvised in one language had to be matched by re-shoots in the other.¹⁶

The crew included cinematographers Santosh Sivan and V. Manikandan, editor A. Sreekar Prasad, and production designer Samir Chanda.⁴ Shooting took place largely on location in forests and at waterfalls, including Athirappilly in Kerala, with the cast and crew walking the last stretch after roads ended.¹⁷ The film was produced by Madras Talkies and Reliance Big Pictures.⁵

Release and box office

Reliance BIG Pictures gave the film a world premiere in London on 16 June 2010 and released it two days later on roughly 2200 screens worldwide: about 1250 screens in India plus 325 overseas for the Hindi version, 225 Indian and 150 overseas screens for the Tamil version, and 215 screens in Andhra Pradesh for the Telugu Villain.² It was also screened in the Gala Presentation section of the 2010 Busan International Film Festival.¹⁸

The Hindi version underperformed. Bollywood Hungama records an India net total of 291.7 million (29.17 crore), with 235.8 million (23.58 crore) in the first week, against overseas gross of $2.23 million.⁷ Box Office India puts the net slightly lower at 289.7 million (28.97 crore) against a budget of 550 million (55 crore) and labels the film a flop.⁸ A PwC industry outlook listed Raavan among 2010's big-budget disappointments, with an estimated budget of 1000 million rupees and net collection of 285.3 million.¹⁹ In the United States it grossed $708,726.²⁰ Trackers disagree sharply on the worldwide total: The Numbers reports $15,284,375, while IMDb reports $1,356,461.²⁰^•¹⁷ The Tamil version performed far better relative to its cost, with a reported $9.7 million worldwide gross against a $5.2 million budget.²¹

Critical reception

Reception of the Hindi version was largely negative, with the film's visuals praised more often than its screenplay. Shubhra Gupta of The Indian Express gave it 2 out of 5, calling Ratnam's subversion of the epic "seriously mixed" and "more miss than hit", while awarding the Tamil Raavanan 3 out of 5 and calling it better directed, better acted and better edited.²² Time Out was an outlier at 4 out of 5, calling it "solid and superior Bollywood entertainment" with stunning monsoon cinematography.³ The Times of India gave 3.5 out of 5, crediting the second half's twists for giving the film its story.¹² India Today was harsher, finding Beera played "as a boy buffoon" rather than a mercurial anti-hero, while singling out Priyamani's account of her character's violation and the film's Kerala and Maharashtra locations as its pleasures.¹¹ On Rotten Tomatoes the Hindi version holds a 46% Tomatometer from three reviews, against 68% from nineteen reviews for the Tamil version.⁵^•²³ Audience scores followed the same split: 5.4/10 on IMDb for the Hindi film, 7.0/10 for the Tamil one.¹^•⁹

Assessment and aftermath

The gap between the two versions became the film's defining legacy. Commentators attributed the Tamil version's strength to Ratnam working in his own language, with Vikram's performance as Veeraiya widely judged the stronger of the two leads.²² Ratnam himself later called the bilingual strategy a mistake, saying the film ended up "neither here nor there"; the Hindi version failed to connect with audiences while the Tamil counterpart succeeded.¹⁰ Retrospective commentary has also treated the film as a political document: its sympathetic outlaw and doubting Rama placed a contemporary adivasi-state conflict inside a sacred narrative, a reading that made it controversial with some viewers at the time of release.¹³ The Hindi version remains available on streaming platforms in India, including Prime Video.¹

References

Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Screen and stage › Film and television › Films and standalone screen works › Individual films by title and year › Indian films (individual works) › Hindi films of the 2010s › Hindi films of 2010

Initially written Oct 3, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 3, 2026; Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 3, 2026; Oct 15, 2026; Oct 21, 2026; Oct 25, 2026; Nov 1, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026

Notice something wrong?