To Catch A Cheater
To Catch A Cheater is an American hidden-camera YouTube series in which a person who suspects their partner of infidelity has that partner secretly tested: a decoy flirts with them in a public place, hidden cameras record the encounter, and the suspicious partner watches the footage with the show's host. The series was created by host Luis Mercado and cameraman Sam (Sameer) Bhavnani and has run on YouTube since May 2, 2016.1 • 2 The title also refers to a separate 2026 Lifetime television movie of the same name, covered at the end of this article.
| Key fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Format | Hidden-camera loyalty test: a decoy approaches the suspected partner in public while cameras record, and the partner who ordered the test watches the replay3 |
| Creators | Host Luis Mercado and cameraman Sam Bhavnani1 |
| Channel | Created May 2, 2016; about 3.05 million subscribers, 595 million total views, 226 videos2 |
| Origin | A 2016 pilot in which an Instagram model was sent to hit on a friend's boyfriend at a Starbucks drew 10 million views on Bhavnani's channel1 |
| Schedule | New episodes Monday nights at 6pm PST4 |
| Authenticity | A 2018 Inside Edition investigation found some segments used hired actors; the creator attributed the claims to couples regretting their appearance5 |
| Distribution | Free on YouTube, with an app on the Apple App Store and Google Play and shorter cuts on TikTok and Instagram6 • 3 |
Spoilers
Plot
How an episode works
A suspicious partner, usually a girlfriend or wife, contacts the show and explains what she suspects and why. Hosts Luis Mercado and Sameer Bhavnani then design a scenario tailored to the target: a flirtatious "hostess" at a fake game show audition, a friendly stranger at a bar, an Instagram model who slides into a DM, a masseuse who works a little too low on the back. The target is always lied to about why cameras are present. The cover story is a game show, a vlog, or a casual interview, anything that justifies a crew and a microphone.
The decoy escalates in stages: a compliment, a touch on the arm, a request for a massage, an exchange of social media handles, an invitation to meet later. The partner who set the trap watches on a monitor nearby, and the camera cuts between the seduction and her face as it curdles from hope to dread.
The endings split into two flavors. In the innocent episodes, the target deflects the decoy, mentions his girlfriend unprompted, or physically backs away, and the reveal is a happy one: the girlfriend walks out, the hidden cameras are pointed out, and the couple hugs it out with the target sputtering with relief. In the guilty episodes, the target flirts back, takes a phone number, leans in for a kiss, or agrees to a date, and the confrontation that follows is the money shot. The wronged partner storms in, the decoy peels off, the target realizes he has been on camera the entire time, and the episode ends in shouting, denial, tears, or an abrupt walk-off. In one widely shared episode, a man named Patrick, told he was auditioning for a game show, flirted with the "hostess," gave her a shoulder massage, and swapped Instagram usernames, all while his girlfriend of two years watched in horror from behind the scenes.15
The episode people remember
The Brittany and Kelsey episode is the one the show's critics always reach for, because it compresses the whole series into five minutes. Kelsey suspects her boyfriend, so she recruits her own best friend, Brittany, to "bump into" him and see what he does. The cameras catch flirting that climbs quickly to a kiss. Kelsey, watching from nearby, comes apart on camera in real time, then storms into the scene. The confrontation is short and vicious: the boyfriend denies, Brittany stands frozen between her two roles as friend and decoy, and the episode cuts off abruptly rather than resolving anything. A columnist for Mamamia described it as the show at its purest, a fight, a kiss, and an ending that drops the viewer mid-argument, and argued that the format works because viewers cannot look away from infidelity, pointing to the roughly 39 million people who had joined the Ashley Madison website since 2001.16
The other signature moment is the reverse sting, the innocent verdict. Episodes where the boyfriend turns the decoy down flat became fan favorites because they are rare enough to feel like victories, and the show milks the reveal: the girlfriend emerges, the target learns he was being tested, and the relief on his face competes with his anger at having been set up at all. Even the "innocent" episodes tend to end with a fight, just a different one.
The show turns on itself
The series' longest-running storyline happened off camera. In 2018, an Inside Edition investigation by Lisa Guerrero found that some of the "couples" were hired actors who had met only on the day of shooting. Micah Potts and Tameika Dawkins were presented on screen as a couple of two years, with Dawkins catching Potts cheating with an Instagram model; both later said they were actors, that the scene was directed, and that Dawkins was coached on exactly when to catch him. "It was all a scene we were doing," Potts said.5 A young woman who appeared cheated-on in two episodes, identified only as Jessica, said nothing about her segment was real, including her name, her age, and the existence of her boyfriend, and that she never even met the person who supposedly cheated on her.5
Sameer Bhavnani rejected the allegations, saying the accusers were "couples who regret being on the show or change their mind and feel that they will take less backlash if they say they were acting instead of saying it's real."5 Luis Mercado has maintained that the show is genuine and framed it as a public service: "I think we're providing a valuable service. People get to see the truth and what their significant other's intentions are when they're not around."17 TVovermind's own verdict was that the show does appear to be fake, at least in part.17
Characters
- Luis Mercado (co-creator and host) is the face of the confrontations, the one who walks out with the wronged partner and delivers the reveal. He has spent years defending the show's authenticity in interviews.
- Sameer Bhavnani (co-creator and host) runs the production side and handles the show's public response to the fakery allegations, including the statement blaming regretful participants.
- The decoys and actors are the rotating cast, the hostesses, masseuses, and Instagram models whose escalating flirtations are the engine of every episode.
- The couples supply the drama: one partner who called the show, one partner who does not know they are on it, and a verdict delivered in public.
Interpretations and controversies
The central controversy is authenticity, and it has never been settled. Inside Edition documented hired actors and directed scenes, including a participant whose entire identity on the show was invented.5 Distractify's retrospective put it plainly: for nearly five years the weekly series claimed to be catching real cheaters, and the answer to whether it is scripted is one die-hard fans may not like.18 Critics also argue the premise itself is dishonest, since a staged seduction by a professional decoy is not evidence of anything, a point Mamamia made by noting simply that "this is not how cheating works."16 The show belongs to a lineage that includes the syndicated series Cheaters, which was itself exposed for paying participants to fake scenarios; Cassandra Terrazas, a Dallas hotel receptionist, admitted she was paid $350 to play a woman caught having an affair, and that the ambulance was rented and the blood was fake.19 Naomi Wolf's critique of that earlier show, calling its ambush confrontations a normalization of surveillance, applies almost word for word to this one.20
Format
Each episode begins with a request. Someone who believes a partner may be unfaithful reaches the show via the form on its website or its social media pages, and the application requests the applicant's city, details of the partner's habits, such as where they go drinking, working out, or shopping, images that let the decoy be matched to that person's type, and verification that the applicant is the one arranging the test. Most submissions are never filmed.3
The test itself follows a fixed mechanic. A decoy is sent to approach the partner in a bar, a gym, a car park, a beach, or another public setting, and hidden cameras record the whole approach. The suspicious partner watches the exchange with host Luis Mercado from another location, and the partner's reaction, along with any confrontation that follows, is recorded for the episode.3 • 7 Commentators on the format note that the dramatic center is not the flirting but the replay, when the partner sees the footage.3
The editing is built for short-form viewing: quick-cut pacing, compressed runtimes, and full captioning for muted playback, a style compared to the production values of Logan Paul's videos.1
Origin and growth
Mercado and Bhavnani said the concept grew out of curiosity about how "average people" would react to being hit on by "super-attractive men and women." Their first subject was the boyfriend of a friend named Luz, a self-described gym rat who was approached by an Instagram model at a Starbucks. He flirted with, kissed, and touched his suitor, and the video drew 10 million views on Bhavnani's YouTube channel, which led to the series.1
The channel grew from nothing to 2.8 million subscribers by mid-2019, according to Mercado, and passed 3 million subscribers with roughly 595 million cumulative views across 226 videos in later channel statistics.8 • 2 Mercado framed the show as a service, telling InTouch Weekly, "People get to see the truth and what their significant other's intentions are when they're not around."1
Authenticity disputes
An October 2018 investigation by Inside Edition, whose chief investigative correspondent Lisa Guerrero tracked down people who had appeared on the show, reported that some segments used hired actors. In one episode, Micah Potts and Tameika Dawkins were portrayed as a couple who had dated for two years when Dawkins caught Potts cheating with an Instagram model; both told Inside Edition they had met that same day and were both paid actors, with Potts saying, "It was all a scene we were doing." The report also described a performer named Jessica who appeared in two episodes as a cheated-on teenager and said her name, age, and boyfriend were invented.5
When asked about the use of actors, the show's creator gave a different explanation: "These are couples who regret being on the show or change their mind and feel that they will take less backlash if they say they were acting instead of saying it's real."5 Outside observers add structural caveats that apply to the format generally: participants sign releases, some identities are obscured, scenes can be reset for camera coverage, and the edit compresses hours into minutes, so no viewer can verify an individual episode from the outside.3
Monetization and controversies
The channel earns through advertising, sponsorship deals plugged at the start of each video, and an Amazon Services LLC Associates Program affiliation, with episode descriptions linking spy cameras, audio recorders, and related products.6 Its crowdsourced funding has been small: as of the late-2010s reporting, the show's Patreon had two patrons and had earned $1 of a $5,000 per month goal.1
In May 2018 the show was caught in a platform-wide purge of videos promoting EduBirdie, an essay-writing service that a BBC investigation found was being promoted on more than 250 YouTube channels. The show tweeted that it lost 49 videos, writing, "1vid/week = years worth of work, dissapeared [sic] over night." Its later videos promoted a different essay-writing service, Tutoriage.1
The format's wider footprint
To Catch a Cheater is one of the earliest hidden-camera loyalty test channels on YouTube, and the format has since produced dozens of imitators, including channels such as UDY that run similar partner-testing setups.3 • 9 The name has also been used separately by a radio-show segment brand: a podcast called To Catch A Cheater, active in 2025, presents "War of the Roses" style call-in loyalty tests rather than hidden-camera stings.10
The 2026 Lifetime movie
A separate work, To Catch a Cheater, is a 2026 Lifetime mystery-thriller television movie directed by Damián Romay and written by Rachel Morton. It premiered on Lifetime on February 15, 2026, and later streamed on Netflix. The plot follows three mothers whose lives unravel after their teenage daughters make a pact to test each other's boyfriends; the morning after the test, one girl, Hannah, is found dead at a beach, and her mother Monica (Kate Watson) searches for the truth. The film runs 1 hour 27 minutes, is rated TV-14, and was filmed in the Miami metropolitan area of Florida. It is a work of fiction with no direct antecedent in a real event.11 • 12 • 13 • 14
References
- The Untold Truth Of To Catch A Cheater, Nicki Swift (Carmen Ribecca)
- To Catch a Cheater's YouTube Statistics, Social Blade
- To Catch A Cheater: How the Loyalty Test Show Works, What It Costs and How to Get On It, Toughest Blogger (Mickael)
- To Catch a Cheater channel profile, SimilarChannels
- Wildly Popular YouTube Series 'To Catch a Cheater' Sometimes Uses Actors, Investigation Finds, Inside Edition
- To Catch a Cheater official website
- This man was set a cheating trap by his girlfriend. She got more than she bargained for, indy100 (Joe Vesey-Byrne)
- Ep17: Luis Mercado, Host of YouTube's "To Catch a Cheater", Surviving Hollywood podcast (July 1, 2019)
- Most Watched Loyalty Test Channels on YouTube, Loyalty Tests Hub
- To Catch A Cheater podcast, Apple Podcasts
- Lifetime Movie To Catch a Cheater Is Streaming on Netflix, Netflix Tudum (Caitlin Busch)
- 'To Catch a Cheater' follows three mothers plagued by paranoia and suspicion, AL.com (Breanna Manley)
- To Catch a Cheater: Filming Locations and Cast Details, The Cinemaholic
- Is To Catch a Cheater Based on a True Story?, Moviedelic
- https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/man-busted-on-shocking-reality-show-designed-to-uncover-cheaters/VTHYSAGCBPF7XFDQ5BAPZCYMGE/
- https://www.mamamia.com.au/to-catch-a-cheater-2/
- https://tvovermind.com/is-the-show-to-catch-a-cheater-fake/
- https://www.distractify.com/p/is-to-catch-a-cheater-scripted
- https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/cheaters-caught-cheating-transcript-52514/
- https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/26/cheaters-sinister-normalisation-surveillance-society
Topic: Encyclopedia › Arts and culture › Screen and stage › Film and television › Series and fictional screen worlds › Unscripted, reality, and web-native series › Celebrity, family, lifestyle, and court reality series › Lifestyle, dating, and docusoaps › Dating and matchmaking series
Initially written Oct 3, 2026 · Reviewed: Oct 3, 2026; Oct 25, 2026 · Edited: Oct 3, 2026; Oct 25, 2026; Nov 1, 2026 · Last review: Oct 25, 2026
Your notes
© 2026 Biostate AI. Free to use with credit under the Edgepedia Community License. Developers: read Edgepedia by API or MCP. Embed a reference card.